You know, I'm just a conservative and old meditator here. A practitioner. I know my own experience with it and I'm having great experiences, thank-you very much. Now I wish them all the best in facilitating things here for me and the community. Has there been some bad behavior on their parts? You bet, heck the FairfieldLife archive is a chronicle to that. Could it be better? Of course. But it is not all bad and still there are a lot of good people in there doing good work. With that there is always hope. Take courage, -Buck in the Dome
--- In [email protected], Duveyoung <no_reply@...> wrote: > > Hegelin is an adulterous womanizer. He's ruined marriage after marriage. > FUCK THAT BASTARD even if he does have a handle on subtle physics. Better > that the world doesn't get to know what he knows then that he's honored by > society when he's doing his sick and evil sex tripping. > > Edg > > --- In [email protected], "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Buck" wrote: > > > > > > I think it is sinful, the carping that you haters and detractors are > > > doing on Hagelin here. He's a good guy and you are sandbagging > > > anonymously on a public forum someone who is doing some very high-minded > > > good work who happens to be modern, spiritual and a scientist. What a > > > bunch of mean-spirited braying sophist ignorant asses. This list could > > > use some firm moderation. > > > > Sinful! What do you want Buck? Turn it into a pro-TM only > > site? Plenty of those about if you don't like this one. > > > > > > High minded good work eh? I think fraud is fraud and claiming > > you can predict and prevent earthquakes for only $100,000 > > counts as fraud. That's what I hate, seeing people get ripped > > off. > > > > His physics is insane, quantum entanglement isn't the mechanism > > behind astrology. Your mind doesn't affect gravity when you are > > "flying", it doesn't go beyond the level of grand unification > > to affect the quantum outcome of the macro universe. I think > > you've been had by a shameless fundamentalist tub-thumper. And > > he hasn't finished Einsteins work no matter how much he claims otherwise. > > The arrogance of the man astonishes me. Why doesn't > > it annoy you Buck? > > > > > > > -Buck in the Dome > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Susan" <wayback71@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <LEnglish5@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <LEnglish5@> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > I've never met Mr. Hagelin. I suspect that if you got him away > > > > > > > from the > > > > > > > TM movement he might be a nice guy. But a scientist? Never. He > > > > > > > owes > > > > > > > his salary and the very fabric of his life to the TM movement he > > > > > > > shills > > > > > > > for. I just thought that because his name is coming up here with > > > > > > > increased frequency, lurkers might want to know who exactly is > > > > > > > being > > > > > > > cited as if the people citing him believed he was actually > > > > > > > credible, and > > > > > > > thus be able to better form their own judgments of his > > > > > > > credibility. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Carry on. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > John's career THESE days involves the TM organization. In his early > > > > > > days, he was very well respected as a theoretical physicist and > > > > > > this included much of his time at MIU (before the name change). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > L. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Barry, Lawson has a point here. John H changed careers long ago, > > > > > which does not negate his brilliance as a scientist. > > > > > > > > That he is the greatest physicist since Einstein is HIS designation and > > > > no one elses. What negates his "brilliance" is the amount of > > > > complete bollocks he talks about just about everything. Have you > > > > ever seen "the physics of yogic flying"? Nuff said. > > > > > > > > > >
