--- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In [email protected], "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > --- In [email protected], "Rory Goff" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "Rory Goff" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Rory Goff" > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Rory Goff" > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ah, but if God is well read, and has delved into > the > > > > > > > > > > Heisenberg Principle, He'd know that to observe is > to > > > > > > > > > > influence, so out of fairness He wouldn't be > > > > watching. :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ah, but if S/H/We weren't watching, nothing would > > > happen :- > > > > ) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How do you know... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Because when there is no watcher/watchee, nothing > > happens :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > But how would you know? > > > > > > > > > > Self-evident ... > > > > > > > > Stepping outside the three gunas -- so that Self (observer) > and > > > All- > > > > that-is are (observed) not different -- is analogous to > looking > > at > > > > the torus from outside, and seeing Vishnu coalesce from the > > outer > > > > shell into the base of the inner double-cone (as Sattva); > Brahma > > > > rotate as the singularity at the center of the double-cone (as > > > > Rajas); and Shiva disperse at the top of the double-cone > > outwards > > > > into the outer shell (as Tamas) -- and yet, because one is no > > > longer > > > > involved in the > > > > movie(s) within this Brahman-torus, nothing actually happens; > > the > > > > whole thing is in stasis. > > > > > > > > This might be akin to the Work of Byron Katie, wherein when we > > > > inquire into the stories of our suffering, we may realize that > > we > > > > have been projecting all of it -- resolving it back into the > > > radiant > > > > clarity and loving fullness of our own emptiful not- > happening :- > > ) > > > > > > So why does Vishnu blend with Brahma, and Brahma blend with > Shiva, > > > but Shiva and Vishnu are absolutely distinct from one another? > > > > Great question! I used to ask this about Sattva and Tamas, which > > were always held to be total opposites and unmixable. I never > really > > got this until seeing their polar functions in the Torus -- and > > understanding them as analogous to magnetic poles does help. Even > if > > we see Sattva in its conventional sense as Light and Tamas as > Dark, > > though, it really does make sense. However, it's interesting that > > Siva/Tamas/the Black Hole is (from the point of view outside the > > Torus anyhow) actually dispersing outward, rather than spiraling > > inward, and Vishnu/Sattva/the White Hole is spiraling inward, > rather > > than dispersing outward... > > Yes, perfect sense! And paradoxical with regard to the 'story' I > always wanted to tell myself, and even my cognition of Vishnu's > vibration recently as very sattvic, but I digress... > > > > > In other words, what does that transition on the outside of the > > > torus, between the ultimate decay of Shiva, and the growing > > > pregnancy of Vishnu look like or represent? it appears to be a > gap > > > of undifferentiated potential; Absolute stillness. No gunas. > > > > > > Or is there something there? > > > > FWIW I see a golden ring occupying that gap, with spokes to that > > ring emanating from the singularity/Brahma-point :-) > > Oh right! I remember now you mentioning this awhile back, before I > was able to see it. Now it makes perfect sense that the golden ring > would be there. Nothing else quite fits, does it? Ah, so not quite a > gap, which given Vishnu and Shiva didn't quite resolve the > vibrational qualities of each...though the golden ring with spokes > to Brahma does! Hmmm, thank you again!
Yes, it would appear to correlate to that golden quality of No- space, No-time identity with the "Solar Angel" which one might take to be Brahma -- incidentally, Bentov also spoke of this fusion with one's Solar Angel on that same Sidhis-prep course, perhaps a year or so before I came across the phenomenon:-) ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
