> > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > > > Whittling the Dome guidelines > > > > > > Those parts in the Dome admission guideline about pundits, joytish and > > > yagyas really don't need to be there. They don't have much to do with > > > running the meditation programs in the Domes. There evidently is > > > something else going on in those paragraphs. > > > > > > > Effectively they are an administrative attempt to control religious > > practices by using the Dome admission as a punishment towards coercing the > > use of TM-sanctioned vedic/hindu astrological and religious practices. > > Part of the policy question becomes: is there not a place in the Domes or > > the TM movement for just practitioners of meditation and the TM-sidhis > > without judging and interfering with people's religious practices? What do > > those paragraphs have to do with running the Dome program? > > Within TM, it seems we have TM and TM-Sidhi practitioners over here, and then > sanctioned TM religious activities over there, like over in Vedic City. > Within this it seems the TM-Rajas with this anti-religious activity policy > are using in a business plan the Dome admission policy as coercion towards > using the TM-sanctioned religious practices more exclusively. >
It's proly bad enough to be 'anti-saint'. Does the new TM.org really want to be known as 'anti-religious' in business as well? Public grants and funding going to an institution discriminating, based on religious activity? That does not sound good at all. > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn <emilymae.reyn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Buck, do you ever ask yourself why you "buck" the system? Â > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bucking? Naw, I'm an Iowan, an old practicing mediator, and a pretty > > > > reasonable person. By experience and the science I'd like to see the > > > > numbers do well in the Domes. I'm quite hope full and I'd like to see > > > > those people facilitate the Dome numbers better. I'm pretty simple. > > > > They've got old problems that they've created with the Dome numbers > > > > with those guidelines and the meditating community. Raja Hagelin has > > > > created a lot of process inside to help run things since Maharishi's > > > > death. Things could change. I got time. > > > > -Buck > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > From: Buck > > > > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 6:19 PM > > > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] TM, the Dome Badge, and Religious Practices > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Â > > > > > Om, waht oh. I may lose my Dome badge, again. I got called in by > > > > > the chief inspector the other day over my religious activities with > > > > > non-TM pundits. If it goes badly they'll take my Dome badge away, > > > > > again. It is still in the balance but it is an interesting thing; > > > > > they have these anti-religious practices paragraphs in the Dome > > > > > meditation admission guidelines that are a snare. The paragraphs are > > > > > part of a business plan to coerce people to use TM movement joytish > > > > > astrology and yagya services more exclusively by using the dome > > > > > admission as a punishment. I had an hour long interview in the Peace > > > > > Palace the other day. Some committee that I'll not see will > > > > > adjudicate my case. "We have something in our files, tell us about > > > > > it." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
