--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn <emilymae.reyn@...> wrote: > > If this is such a priority and they really believe what they are saying, why > don't they just bring in meditators from other countries to reach the goal? > Â Are there not 2000 flyers in the entire world? Â In the name of global > peace, I would think that many of the idealistic and altruistic nature would > volunteer even to pick up and move. Â Â >
Em, Yes that would make sense. No, proly won't happen. Things seem to have got irreconcilable between the movement.org and the old meditating community for getting more meditators to come to the Domes. Hence the project of out-sourcing meditation to young Indian boys brought from India to FF to achieve the numbers has become easier. It is old TM history playing out. -Buck > > ________________________________ > From: Buck > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 4:31 AM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM, the Dome Badge, and Religious Practices > > > Â > The Dome meditation numbers: > http://invincibleamerica.org/tallies/ > > "The immediate urgent priority for national invincibility and world peace is > to join the Invincible America Assembly at MUM. Only 2000 Flyers in > Fairfield/Maharishi Vedic City will bring security to America and defuse the > precarious escalation of conflict in the world." > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hopefully guidelines facilitate what you are doing and don't get in > > the way of what you are doing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Whittling the Dome guidelines > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Those parts in the Dome admission guideline about pundits, > > joytish and yagyas really don't need to be there. They don't have much > > to do with running the meditation programs in the Domes. There > > evidently is something else going on in those paragraphs. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Effectively they are an administrative attempt to control > > religious practices by using the Dome admission as a punishment towards > > coercing the use of TM-sanctioned vedic/hindu astrological and religious > > practices. Part of the policy question becomes: is there not a place in > > the Domes or the TM movement for just practitioners of meditation and > > the TM-sidhis without judging and interfering with people's religious > > practices? What do those paragraphs have to do with running the Dome > > program? > > > > > > > > > > Within TM, it seems we have TM and TM-Sidhi practitioners over > > here, and then sanctioned TM religious activities over there, like over > > in Vedic City. Within this it seems the TM-Rajas with this > > anti-religious activity policy are using in a business plan the Dome > > admission policy as coercion towards using the TM-sanctioned religious > > practices more exclusively. > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's proly bad enough to be 'anti-saint'. Does the new TM.org > > really want to be known as 'anti-religious' in business as well? Public > > grants and funding going to an institution discriminating, based on > > religious activity? That does not sound good at all. > > > > > > With those anti-religious TM guidelines about access to these other > > astrological systems or religious people or indeed about hosting them, > > then one would worry for TM and the Dome meditation. Those paragraphs > > really don't need to be in the guidelines for running the Domes. They > > certainly could be changed or deleted. This would help people a lot > > from having to look over their shoulder if they have a valid Dome badge > > or would like to apply for one if they are meditators. There are very > > few TM-virgins anymore and there's a lot of people in the Dome who > > meditate in a fear for their status for being found out. It's the way > > it is and it's a communal problem with the Dome meditation. > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn > > <emilymae.reyn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Buck, do you ever ask yourself why you "buck" the system? > > Ã > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bucking? Naw, I'm an Iowan, an old practicing mediator, and > > a pretty reasonable person. By experience and the science I'd like to > > see the numbers do well in the Domes. I'm quite hope full and I'd like > > to see those people facilitate the Dome numbers better. I'm pretty > > simple. They've got old problems that they've created with the Dome > > numbers with those guidelines and the meditating community. Raja > > Hagelin has created a lot of process inside to help run things since > > Maharishi's death. Things could change. I got time. > > > > > > > > -Buck > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > > > > From: Buck > > > > > > > > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 6:19 PM > > > > > > > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] TM, the Dome Badge, and Religious > > Practices > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ã > > > > > > > > > Om, waht oh. I may lose my Dome badge, again. I got > > called in by the chief inspector the other day over my religious > > activities with non-TM pundits. If it goes badly they'll take my Dome > > badge away, again. It is still in the balance but it is an interesting > > thing; they have these anti-religious practices paragraphs in the Dome > > meditation admission guidelines that are a snare. The paragraphs are > > part of a business plan to coerce people to use TM movement joytish > > astrology and yagya services more exclusively by using the dome > > admission as a punishment. I had an hour long interview in the Peace > > Palace the other day. Some committee that I'll not see will adjudicate > > my case. "We have something in our files, tell us about it." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
