The Dome meditation numbers: http://invincibleamerica.org/tallies/
"The immediate urgent priority for national invincibility and world peace is to join the Invincible America Assembly at MUM. Only 2000 Flyers in Fairfield/Maharishi Vedic City will bring security to America and defuse the precarious escalation of conflict in the world." > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > > > Hopefully guidelines facilitate what you are doing and don't get in > the way of what you are doing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Whittling the Dome guidelines > > > > > > > > > > > > Those parts in the Dome admission guideline about pundits, > joytish and yagyas really don't need to be there. They don't have much > to do with running the meditation programs in the Domes. There > evidently is something else going on in those paragraphs. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Effectively they are an administrative attempt to control > religious practices by using the Dome admission as a punishment towards > coercing the use of TM-sanctioned vedic/hindu astrological and religious > practices. Part of the policy question becomes: is there not a place in > the Domes or the TM movement for just practitioners of meditation and > the TM-sidhis without judging and interfering with people's religious > practices? What do those paragraphs have to do with running the Dome > program? > > > > > > > > Within TM, it seems we have TM and TM-Sidhi practitioners over > here, and then sanctioned TM religious activities over there, like over > in Vedic City. Within this it seems the TM-Rajas with this > anti-religious activity policy are using in a business plan the Dome > admission policy as coercion towards using the TM-sanctioned religious > practices more exclusively. > > > > > > > > > > It's proly bad enough to be 'anti-saint'. Does the new TM.org > really want to be known as 'anti-religious' in business as well? Public > grants and funding going to an institution discriminating, based on > religious activity? That does not sound good at all. > > > > With those anti-religious TM guidelines about access to these other > astrological systems or religious people or indeed about hosting them, > then one would worry for TM and the Dome meditation. Those paragraphs > really don't need to be in the guidelines for running the Domes. They > certainly could be changed or deleted. This would help people a lot > from having to look over their shoulder if they have a valid Dome badge > or would like to apply for one if they are meditators. There are very > few TM-virgins anymore and there's a lot of people in the Dome who > meditate in a fear for their status for being found out. It's the way > it is and it's a communal problem with the Dome meditation. > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn > <emilymae.reyn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Buck, do you ever ask yourself why you "buck" the system? > Â > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bucking? Naw, I'm an Iowan, an old practicing mediator, and > a pretty reasonable person. By experience and the science I'd like to > see the numbers do well in the Domes. I'm quite hope full and I'd like > to see those people facilitate the Dome numbers better. I'm pretty > simple. They've got old problems that they've created with the Dome > numbers with those guidelines and the meditating community. Raja > Hagelin has created a lot of process inside to help run things since > Maharishi's death. Things could change. I got time. > > > > > > > -Buck > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > > > From: Buck > > > > > > > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 6:19 PM > > > > > > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] TM, the Dome Badge, and Religious > Practices > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Â > > > > > > > > Om, waht oh. I may lose my Dome badge, again. I got > called in by the chief inspector the other day over my religious > activities with non-TM pundits. If it goes badly they'll take my Dome > badge away, again. It is still in the balance but it is an interesting > thing; they have these anti-religious practices paragraphs in the Dome > meditation admission guidelines that are a snare. The paragraphs are > part of a business plan to coerce people to use TM movement joytish > astrology and yagya services more exclusively by using the dome > admission as a punishment. I had an hour long interview in the Peace > Palace the other day. Some committee that I'll not see will adjudicate > my case. "We have something in our files, tell us about it." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
