--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <LEnglish5@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > [...] > > > > > > Do you really think it's *ethical* for an organization > > > that claims to have the secret to achieving world peace, > > > and that *clearly* has the money to fund such an effort > > > themselves, to not do so? If so, please explain your > > > reasons for believing this. > > > > I still don't see the "clearly" here. > > Still playing dodgeball. I am disappointed. > > *Assume* that the TMO had all the money it needed > to fund as many buttbouncers as it claims it needs > to achieve world peace. Is there *any* reason that > you can think of that would be valid for not paying > for it themselves? >
Other than they're trying to arrange a permanent facility, no. But they are. L
