Speaking of posting while intoxicated... L
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote: > > Hi Dan (or whoever you are), > > Even skimming FFL in Message View, it was impossible > for me to not notice that its posters are being told > by one of the group's professional cult apologists > that the person who made the recent inflammatory, > profane, and above all stupid posts on August 4th > was not you. The cult apologist claims that your > account had "obviously" been hacked, and that it's > not really you. > > Assuming that this is true, and that you didn't just > suffer from a bout of Posting While Intoxicated > (the conclusion that most non-cult apologists would > come to), I'm curious as to how you, as a hacker, > decided to do what you did. Would you mind answering > a few questions about it? > > 1. How did you, after having somehow hacked into > danfriedman2002's Yahoo account, decide where you > were going to post the rants intended to make him > look bad? How did you happen to settle on Fairfield > Life? > > 2. How did you manage to emulate Real Dan's > consistent bad spelling? > > 3. How did you decide which other posters to > reply to with a stream of invective? I mean, you > could have picked *anyone*, at random. What made > you decide to lash out at (coincidentally) two of > the same people that The Real Dan had lashed out at > in his Real Posts, for the alleged crime of being > "anti-guru?" Was that just coincidence, or did you > plan that in your attempts to make Real Dan look > bad? > > 4. Once you *had* settled on these two people to > spray with invective, how did you know what their > common derogatory nicknames were on this forum? > I mean, you called vajradhatu108 "Vag," a derog- > atory and insulting permutation of his posting > ID that is commonly used here by people with a > grudge against him. Similarly, having picked him > at random for your drive-by, you called turquoiseb > "turq" and "turqy," again almost as if you were > very familiar with how *he* was addressed on this > forum by his detractors. How did you know all this? > > 5. Finally, since I'm pretty sure in this post > that I'm addressing Real Dan, the person who made > all of the posts on August 4th, are you feeling > better and a little more sane now? I hope so. > > 6. What was it (other than being drunk or stoned > or both) that "set you off" and caused you to > embarrass yourself like this? Did your regular > practice of TM cause (as one person suggested) > "some roughness of awareness?" Does this happen > to you often? > > 7. Did you actually have to PAY the professional > cult apologist to claim that it wasn't really > you making these posts, or is that something > that professional cult apologists just DO when > a member of their cult embarrasses it? > > Thanks for taking the time to answer these > questions, and I really hope you come back to > visit us soon, and after having imbibed in > the same substances that inspired you last > time. As I said before, the more often that > long-term TM practitioners such as yourself > *demonstrate* on this forum all that TM has > done for them, and what balanced and happy > individuals they've become as a result, the > more new people will learn TM. > > Jai Guru Fucking Dev, and all that... >