You abhorrent, abominable, appalling, awful, baseborn, common, disgusting, distasteful, dreadful, evil, foul, fulsome, gross, hideous, horrendous, horrible, horrid, ignoble, inferior, loathsome, low, lowborn, lower-class, low-life, lowly, lumpen, mean, nasty, nauseating, nauseous, noisome, noxious, obnoxious, obscene, odious, offensive, plebeian, prole, proletarian, rancid, repellent, repugnant, repulsive, revolting, scandalous, shocking, sickening, ugly, unwashed, vulgar, imbecile, minute-man, dumbaz.
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 10:33 AM, azgrey <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote: > ** > > > Robin W Carlsen has spoken, but it's impossible to decode his incoherent > message. Perhaps he's saying that all any child needs is a big dose of > television every day. Then again, he might be babbling that he was chosen > by God as the trustee of His wishes and desires. Let's get down to brass > tacks: It is appalling to me that he has managed to ignore compromise and > focus solely on his personal agenda. And let me tell you, he all but forces > his underlings to make our lives a living hell. Interestingly, Robin's > underlings don't much seem to mind being given such querulous orders. I > guess it's hard to free chauvinistic, pompous luftmenschen from the chains > they revere. A related observation is that there's something fishy about > Robin's insults. I think he's up to something, something beer-guzzling and > perhaps even shameless. > > Robin attributes the most distorted, bizarre, and ludicrous "meanings" to > ordinary personality characteristics. For example, if you're shy, he calls > you "fearful and withdrawn". If, instead, you're the outgoing and active > type, Robin says you're "acting out due to trauma". Why does he say such > things? This is an important question because if you read between the lines > of his ploys, you'll really find that if we don't offer true constructive > criticism—listening to the whole issue, recognizing the problems, > recognizing what is being done right, and getting involved to help remedy > the problem—then Robin will impinge upon our daily lives. This message has > been brought to you by the Department of Blinding Obviousness. What might > not be so obvious, however, is that Robin doesn't use words for > communication or for exchanging information. He uses them to disarm, to > hypnotize, to mislead, and to deceive. > > It may be unfashionable to say so and it may surprise a few of you out > there, but we can't afford to be so subhuman in such difficult times. Of > that I am certain because Robin fails to comprehend and practice the > teachings of his religion. More precisely, he conveniently forgets his > religion's messages of peace, love, compassion, acceptance, and > forgiveness—or, at best, misremembers them as an edict to set the wolf to > mind the sheep. If he makes fun of me or insults me I hear it, and it > hurts. But I take solace in the fact that I am still able to oppose evil > wherever it rears its sententious head. Even when Robin isn't lying, he's > using facts, emphasizing facts, bearing down on facts, sliding off facts, > quietly ignoring facts, and, above all, interpreting facts in a way that > will enable him to entangle our peace and prosperity in the toils of the > ambition, rivalship, interest, humor, or caprice of scornful misosophists. > He operates on an international scale to confuse, befuddle, and neutralize > public opposition. It's only fitting, therefore, that we, too, work on an > international scale but to celebrate knowledge and truth for the sake of > knowledge and truth. > > As sure as you're born, there must be justice for all of us or there will > be peace for none. For that reason, his helpers are unified under a common > goal. That goal is to leave a generation of people planted in the mud of a > neo-oleaginous world to begin a new life in the shadows of heathenism. > Robin's dream is to assume total control over society's means of > production. Those with membership cards in his coven will be given whatever > they want while the rest of us will be sent away empty-handed. In addition > to being completely unfair, such policies promote yielding this country to > the forces of darkness, oppression, and tyranny. Furthermore, he once had > the audacity to tell me that "metanarratives" are the root of tyranny, > lawlessness, overpopulation, racial hatred, world hunger, disease, and rank > stupidity. My riposte was that if you read his writings while mentally out > of focus, you may get the sense that hanging out with crude palookas is a > wonderful, culturally enriching experience. But if you read Robin's > writings while mentally in focus and weigh each point carefully, it's clear > that I personally unequivocally have no appetite for conditioning the > public—or, more precisely, brainwashing the public—into believing that > society is supposed to be lenient towards unreasonable tosspots. Many > sinful televangelists, however, do. That's why I want them all to read this > letter and others like it and discover for themselves that to Robin's mind, > he acts in the name of equality and social justice. So that means that he > can ignore rules, laws, and protocol without repercussion, right? No, not > right. The truth is that I'd like very much to respond to Robin's claim > that he has the linguistic prowess to produce a masterwork of meritorious > literature. Unfortunately, taking into account Robin's background, > education, and intelligence, I am quite sure that Robin would not be able > to understand my response. Hence, let me say simply this: Robin claims that > the health effects of secondhand smoke are negligible. That claim > illustrates a serious reasoning fallacy, one that is pandemic in his > philippics. Then again, Robin claims to have data supporting his assertion > that he can absorb mana by devouring his enemies' brains. Naturally, he > insists that he can't actually show us that data—for some unspecified > reason, of course. My guess is that he's hiding something. Maybe he's > hiding the fact that his behavior might be different if he were told that > I'm not going to respond to his causeries beyond saying that the reasons > that he gives for his stratagems clearly do not correspond with his real > motives. Of course, as far as Robin is concerned, this fact will fall into > the category of, "My mind is made up; don't confuse me with the facts." > That's why I'm telling you that if he believes that the rules don't apply > to him, then it's obvious why he thinks that oligarchism and ethnocentrism > are identical concepts. > > If we briefly prescind from the main point of this letter we can focus on > how Robin alleges that he has achieved sainthood. Naturally, this is a tale > told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing. Common-sense > understanding of human nature tells us that I want to thank him for his > communiqués. They give me an excellent opportunity to illustrate just how > dastardly Robin can be. I have often maintained that reasonable people can > reasonably disagree. Unfortunately, when dealing with Robin and his > patsies, that claim assumes facts not in evidence. So let me claim instead > that Robin needs to realize that he's not special. He's not a beautiful or > unique snowflake. He's just another ugly sybarite who wants to bar people > from partaking in activities that cannot be monitored and controlled. > > Most of us who have been around for a while realize that Robin's ability > to capitalize on the economic chaos, racial tensions, and social discontent > of the current historical moment can be explained in large part by the > following. Whenever Robin attempts to undermine the current world order, he > looks around waiting for applause as if he's done something decent and > moral rather than flippant and careless. I alluded to this earlier, but we > need to lead each other towards the understanding that confused autocrats > have exerted care always to use high-sounding words like > "anthropogeographical" to hide Robin's plans to prime the pump of > incendiarism. You don't believe me? Well, consider that the earth presents > a wonderful example of variety in all classes of the animal and vegetable > kingdoms. People, beasts, and plants belonging to distinct classes all > exhibit special qualities and peculiarities. Unfortunately, Robin's special > quality is that he likes creating a one-world government, stripped of > nationalistic and regional boundaries, that is obedient to his agenda. > That's the most damnable thing about him. It's also why if Robin were as > bright as he thinks he is, he'd know that his disquisitions truly qualify > for the most vile and contemptuous pejoratives that I have in my arsenal. > Excuse me; that's not entirely correct. What I meant to say is that it's > Robin's deep-seated belief that he is entitled to twist the history, > sociology, and anthropology disseminated by our mass media and in our > children's textbooks. Sure, he might be able to justify conclusions like > that—using biased or one-sided information, of course—but I prefer to know > the whole story. In this case, the whole story is that in a recent > tell-all, a former member of Robin's camp writes that "authority without > wisdom is mere noise against the music of eternity". Those are some pretty > harsh words even when one considers that Robin must have recently made a > huge withdrawal from the First National Bank of Lies. How else could he > manage to tell us that his ultimata are all sweetness and light? > > Robin has been known to say that courtesy and manners don't count for > anything. Let me interpret that for you. Robin is really saying that he > intends to consign most of us to the role of his servants or slaves sooner > than you think. He obviously can't come out and say it that way because too > many people would realize that I am hurt, furious, and embarrassed. Why am > I hurt? Because I unmistakably feel that he has insulted everyone with even > the slightest moral commitment. Robin obviously has none or he wouldn't > spawn delusions of Trotskyism's resplendence. Why am I furious? Because > whenever he hears that maledicent twits are creating a tasteless world of > guilt and shame, Robin puts on his usual kabuki of feigned outrage. In > private, however, he secretly supports such activities. Even worse, Robin > thinks that mediocrity is a worthwhile goal. This is a fixed and false > (i.e., delusional) belief that will lead to his disguising the complexity > of color, the brutality of class, and the importance of religion and sexual > identity in the construction and practice of colonialism in the immediate > years ahead. I don't know if we can cure Robin of this raucous belief, but > I do know that he is capable of only two things, namely whining and > underhanded tricks. And why am I embarrassed? Because he sees no reason why > he shouldn't fleece people out of their life's savings. It is only through > an enlightened, outraged citizenry that such moral turpitude, corruption, > and degradation of the law can be brought to a halt. So, let me enlighten > and outrage you by stating that I will never give up. I will never stop > trying. And I will use every avenue possible to champion the force of > goodness against the greed of larcenous, cuckoo omadhauns. > > Look, Robin's apocrisiaries all have serious personal problems. In fact, > the way he keeps them loyal to him is by encouraging and exacerbating these > problems rather than by helping to overcome them. Robin, get a life! > > All right, enough of that. Now let's talk about something else. Let's talk > about how our conception of hooliganism still remains a good deal less > clear than we would wish. There are several logical contradictions in his > position on this matter. For example, Robin is an inspiration to testy, > irascible pauteners everywhere. They panegyrize his crusade to convert our > children to cultural zombies in a mass of unthinking and easily herded > proletarian cattle, and, more importantly, they don't realize that Robin > wants us to believe that we can solve all of our problems by giving him > lots of money. We might as well toss that money down a well because we'll > never see it again. What we will see, however, is that the issues > surrounding sectarianism are more complex and embedded than Robin will > admit. Don't make the mistake of thinking otherwise. Robin does, and that's > why he is thoroughly mistaken if he believes that he can walk on water. > > I never intend to offend anyone, Robin included. Alas, the following > statement may upset a few people: Robin's jobations are as appealing as > braces, acne, and a wooden leg at the senior prom. Some people squirm a bit > when they they read things like that, but such statements are the key to > explaining why our top priority in the upcoming weeks must be to seek > liberty, equality, and fraternity. Look, of course that's going to be > tough. Anybody who tells you it's going to be easy or that one can wave a > magic wand and make it happen hasn't been paying attention to how Robin > operates. Nevertheless, Robin ignores the most basic ground rule of debate. > In case you're not familiar with it, that rule is: attack the idea, not the > person. I have now said everything there is to say. So, to summarize it > all, Robin W Carlsen's minions are stampeding happily and mindlessly toward > the precipice of money-grubbing gangsterism. > > >
