Judy,

When I wrote 'email' I refer to private communications. When I wrote 'Post" I 
specifically meant Post to FFL. I hope this clarification helps, as I have been 
very careful to choose the proper language throughout. No need to fuel the 
"DELIBERATE MISUNDERSTANDING" that some play around with. You, of course are 
quite literal, so you may not suspect that kind of behavior. Everything that I 
write is precise, whether thru email, or Post to FFL. Thank you for requesting 
this clarification, which can only highlight Batty's Duplicity.


For further clarification: As I recently POSTED to my new friend seventhray1, I 
sometime get a little less precise in my POSTS TO BATTY. I guess he just sets 
me off, sometimes.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@...> wrote:
>
> Dan, I've said this before, but I'll say it again for the
> record: It's one thing to criticize Barry for his behavior
> on FFL; it's quite another to make accusations about his
> private life that you cannot publicly back up with evidence.
> That's just unacceptable.
> 
> BTW, it can be important not to confuse the terms "post"
> and "email." Anything sent to Fairfield Life is a "post,"
> whether you read it on the Web site or receive it via
> email. "Email" is what you send to an individual, privately.
> 
> We know that Barry did receive an email from you that went
> out accidentally from your wife's email address (you had
> intended it to be a post to FFL). We know this because Barry
> posted to FFL about it. So when he says he never received an
> email from you, that's obviously deliberately misleading.
> 
> Do you claim you've sent him other emails (i.e., private
> communications)? Or when you say you've sent him emails,
> do you mean FFL posts directed to him?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, danfriedman2002 <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > seventhray1,
> > 
> > Is this another post responding to Batty, responding to seventhray1, 
> > responding to Batty, responding to seventhray1...
> > 
> > You two have something going here. It's brilliant!
> > 
> > It's not only your tone seventhray1, it's your actual uninformed, 
> > opinionated words.
> > 
> > There I've said it very simple terms, so that you can understand.
> > 
> > 
> > Now, go back and party with your Buddy Batty, you two *really* do deserve 
> > each other.
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" <steve.sundur@> wrote:
> > >
> > > 
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Although I will not interact with Dan Friedman any more,
> > > > because I feel that to do so encourages his obvious
> > > > mental illness, I feel the need to do what Curtis had
> > > > to do recently.
> > > Good advice.  His slander is blatant.
> > > > Dan has NEVER sent me an email. Not one. I have the
> > > > records of all of the email services I use to prove it.
> > > >
> > > > This guy is a nut case. His threats of violence against
> > > > me have already been reported to the proper authorities.
> > > > I encourage others here to stop encouraging him in his
> > > > delusional fantasies. To do so is to legally put yourself
> > > > at risk if he ever acts out on his threats.
> > > >
> > > > As a note to "asleep at the wheel" Rick Archer, you are
> > > > equally at risk. Check the case law on this.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, danfriedman2002 no_reply@ wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > seventhray1,
> > > > >
> > > > > Quit hiding behind you bullshit of "there are many interpretations
> > > to posts here", it's way too close to explanations provided by the brave
> > > Nazi supporters. Don't like my tone? Then quit bullshitting.
> > > > >
> > > > > Interesting that you tell me to get over an incident that insulted
> > > and disgusted my wife, while you get yourself all
> > > tied-up-in-your=panties about my correcting you. Why don't you admit
> > > that you were wrong and move on? Good friendly advice.
> > > > >
> > > > > The last thing you said would have merit, if it too, weren't
> > > completely wrong. I explained directly to you that finding out who the
> > > true Batty is sickened me, and prompted my posting. I also explained
> > > that I would not have had to post anything had Batty replied to my
> > > friendly-tone emails.
> > > > >
> > > > > And yes, you are acting the fool. But you can change.
>


Reply via email to