seventhray1, Is this another post responding to Batty, responding to seventhray1, responding to Batty, responding to seventhray1...
You two have something going here. It's brilliant! It's not only your tone seventhray1, it's your actual uninformed, opinionated words. There I've said it very simple terms, so that you can understand. Now, go back and party with your Buddy Batty, you two *really* do deserve each other. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" <steve.sundur@...> wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > Although I will not interact with Dan Friedman any more, > > because I feel that to do so encourages his obvious > > mental illness, I feel the need to do what Curtis had > > to do recently. > Good advice. His slander is blatant. > > Dan has NEVER sent me an email. Not one. I have the > > records of all of the email services I use to prove it. > > > > This guy is a nut case. His threats of violence against > > me have already been reported to the proper authorities. > > I encourage others here to stop encouraging him in his > > delusional fantasies. To do so is to legally put yourself > > at risk if he ever acts out on his threats. > > > > As a note to "asleep at the wheel" Rick Archer, you are > > equally at risk. Check the case law on this. > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, danfriedman2002 no_reply@ wrote: > > > > > > seventhray1, > > > > > > Quit hiding behind you bullshit of "there are many interpretations > to posts here", it's way too close to explanations provided by the brave > Nazi supporters. Don't like my tone? Then quit bullshitting. > > > > > > Interesting that you tell me to get over an incident that insulted > and disgusted my wife, while you get yourself all > tied-up-in-your=panties about my correcting you. Why don't you admit > that you were wrong and move on? Good friendly advice. > > > > > > The last thing you said would have merit, if it too, weren't > completely wrong. I explained directly to you that finding out who the > true Batty is sickened me, and prompted my posting. I also explained > that I would not have had to post anything had Batty replied to my > friendly-tone emails. > > > > > > And yes, you are acting the fool. But you can change. > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" <steve.sundur@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > As I said Dan, there are many interpretations to posts here . I > reread > > > > the the link Judy provided. Barry was being his usual mischievous > self > > > > and poking fun at you through your error. FFL has never been known > for > > > > its proper manners, or apologies. Do you think it might be time to > get > > > > over this event that happened 1-1/2 years ago? Was it that > egregious an > > > > offense that you need to bring it up like it happend yesterday? > Either > > > > way is fine with me, but I do reserve the right to chime in with > my > > > > opinion, and certainly you have right to call me a fool. > > > > > > > > Oh I just reread what you wrote below. And that is fascinating > about > > > > receiving books and tapes all pertaining to this very event or > maybe > > > > just about Barry in general. Either way that is impressive. I > mean, > > > > what could be next? A documentary? > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, danfriedman2002 <no_reply@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > seventhray1, > > > > > > > > > > I am not surprised that you wrote to Ann, rather than to me; it > says a > > > > lot about you. > > > > > > > > > > My words are correct, yours, not-so-much. > > > > > > > > > > So where shall I begin? "With your being too lazy to look it up" > > > > before making your incredulous accusation. Lazy, lazy, lazy...but > I > > > > think you know that. What you don't seem to understand is common > > > > decency, for which there is no easy remedy, other than to confront > your > > > > lying face (and not with 'I may be right here, or I may be wrong, > but > > > > believe me, I'm right'. Pussy - and again, not with the good > meaning. > > > > > > > > > > Barry fucking Googled my wife, then proceeded to email her the > > > > strangest words she had ever read. She was rightfully disgusted. > When I > > > > asked Barry about what he had done, he offered no decency. He is > devoid > > > > of decency, as I see is more common that I'd known. > > > > > > > > > > There is nothing new here for me, other than you're strange > post. What > > > > has changed is that I now know a great deal more about Barry. That > is > > > > good for me. > > > > > > > > > > P.S. You seem to be in a great minority with your misinformed > opinion. > > > > I have received emails of encouragement, books, tapes and > well-wishes > > > > from others who know that I'm correct IN EVERY WORD I WRITE. > Something > > > > you should learn. Stop your bullshitting. > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" > steve.sundur@ > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ann, > > > > > > > > > > > > I think if you check into this you will find that Dan's > accusation > > > > of > > > > > > Barry bringing Dan's wife into a dispute is not correct. > > > > > > > > > > > > For one, I think the alleged transgration took place about two > years > > > > > > ago. Or maybe it was a little less. I am too lazy to look it > up, and > > > > > > so may be proved wrong. But as I mentioned before, I believe > it was > > > > Dan > > > > > > who made a post to Barry using his wife's e-mail account. > Barry then > > > > > > commented on that in his postings here, and that seemed to > infuriate > > > > > > Dan. > > > > > > > > > > > > Judy recently posted the exchanage, I believe. But I think a > wrong > > > > > > impression is being given by Dan. > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps a rereading of the exchange will prove me wrong, or at > least > > > > be > > > > > > show the possibility of different interpretations. We have a > lot of > > > > > > that here. > > > > > > > > > > > > There seems to be intense hatred of Barry by Dan. I am not > sure why > > > > > > this old issue is being brought up as though it were new. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater > <no_reply@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is ramping up nicely to be the ultimate pissing match > between > > > > two > > > > > > testosterone > > > > > > > fueled individuals who refuse to back down. Just what we > need now. > > > > > > > Barry, how about taking the high road and leave Dan' s wife > out of > > > > > > this? Conflict resolution is not your strong point but surely > you > > > > > > possess some grey cells that could pass for a brain. > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb > <no_reply@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > More on this developing story as it emerges... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As promised... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ AP ] Police and DEA agents in New York City, working > > > > > > > > in conjunction with the Department of Homeland Security, > > > > > > > > are hot on the trail of a B, V, and C addict whom they > > > > > > > > have been notified has become so deranged by the drug > > > > > > > > that he's making threats over the Internet. The DHS has > > > > > > > > become involved because making such threats is now a > > > > > > > > crime that falls under the domain of Homeland Security. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DEA agent Hank Schrader, asked to comment, said, "See? > > > > > > > > We *told* you that B, V, and C were dangerous! Look what > > > > > > > > they have done to this poor guy. Either that or the cult > > > > > > > > meditation thing he's into." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DHS agents caution the public not to be concerned, because > > > > > > > > they have the threat-maker under surveillance, and have > > > > > > > > forwarded his threats to his wife to let her know who > > > > > > > > exactly she is married to. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
