seventhray1, I am not surprised that you wrote to Ann, rather than to me; it says a lot about you.
My words are correct, yours, not-so-much. So where shall I begin? "With your being too lazy to look it up" before making your incredulous accusation. Lazy, lazy, lazy...but I think you know that. What you don't seem to understand is common decency, for which there is no easy remedy, other than to confront your lying face (and not with 'I may be right here, or I may be wrong, but believe me, I'm right'. Pussy - and again, not with the good meaning. Barry fucking Googled my wife, then proceeded to email her the strangest words she had ever read. She was rightfully disgusted. When I asked Barry about what he had done, he offered no decency. He is devoid of decency, as I see is more common that I'd known. There is nothing new here for me, other than you're strange post. What has changed is that I now know a great deal more about Barry. That is good for me. P.S. You seem to be in a great minority with your misinformed opinion. I have received emails of encouragement, books, tapes and well-wishes from others who know that I'm correct IN EVERY WORD I WRITE. Something you should learn. Stop your bullshitting. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" <steve.sundur@...> wrote: > > > Ann, > > I think if you check into this you will find that Dan's accusation of > Barry bringing Dan's wife into a dispute is not correct. > > For one, I think the alleged transgration took place about two years > ago. Or maybe it was a little less. I am too lazy to look it up, and > so may be proved wrong. But as I mentioned before, I believe it was Dan > who made a post to Barry using his wife's e-mail account. Barry then > commented on that in his postings here, and that seemed to infuriate > Dan. > > Judy recently posted the exchanage, I believe. But I think a wrong > impression is being given by Dan. > > Perhaps a rereading of the exchange will prove me wrong, or at least be > show the possibility of different interpretations. We have a lot of > that here. > > There seems to be intense hatred of Barry by Dan. I am not sure why > this old issue is being brought up as though it were new. > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater <no_reply@> > wrote: > > > > This is ramping up nicely to be the ultimate pissing match between two > testosterone > > fueled individuals who refuse to back down. Just what we need now. > > Barry, how about taking the high road and leave Dan' s wife out of > this? Conflict resolution is not your strong point but surely you > possess some grey cells that could pass for a brain. > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > More on this developing story as it emerges... > > > > > > As promised... > > > > > > [ AP ] Police and DEA agents in New York City, working > > > in conjunction with the Department of Homeland Security, > > > are hot on the trail of a B, V, and C addict whom they > > > have been notified has become so deranged by the drug > > > that he's making threats over the Internet. The DHS has > > > become involved because making such threats is now a > > > crime that falls under the domain of Homeland Security. > > > > > > DEA agent Hank Schrader, asked to comment, said, "See? > > > We *told* you that B, V, and C were dangerous! Look what > > > they have done to this poor guy. Either that or the cult > > > meditation thing he's into." > > > > > > DHS agents caution the public not to be concerned, because > > > they have the threat-maker under surveillance, and have > > > forwarded his threats to his wife to let her know who > > > exactly she is married to. > > > > > >
