--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > dear authfriend, it is far easier to build a nice new home, than to > > continually attempt to fix another's that is shoddy, and always in need of > > repair - kindly, The Good Doctor. in SBAL it says you can tell by the > > outside of a dwelling, the consciousness of the inhabitants. > > Doc, although I addressed Barry directly, it was not in an > attempt to "fix" him, simply to correct his assertions for > the record. > > And if you'll forgive me, while your observations are > interesting, it's generally not considered good form for a > newbie to a forum to instruct its members in how to conduct > themselves. Stick around, participate in conversations, get > to know the other members, absorb some of the context of > the group and its dynamics. Then you'll be in a better > position to offer advice.
Rx for you Dr, the Ph.D Judy knows of what she speaks. I think she may be gently encouraging you to put away your stethoscope, stow your blood pressure machine and tuck the tongue depressor away for a while yet. We aren't taking your vitals yet, not time. Welcome aboard however, just let's not insist we take down our pants and let you jab us with that vaccination quite yet. > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > <snip> > > > > WHY he "seemed normal" was that he *joined them* in their online > > > > harassment and persecution of the woman in question. It was more > > > > important to them to "get" the woman they collectively disliked > > > > than to notice that he was in a fragile mental state, and in need > > > > of *help* in dealing with his psychological problems, not in > > > > acting them out. > > > > > > > > Does any of this sound *familiar* to Fairfield Life members? > > > > > > Only by way of your posts pretending that it happens here. > > > > > > > This shit is dangerous, people. You're messing with fragile > > > > and unbalanced personalities > > > > > > You mean to say "people who *in my opinion* are fragile > > > and unbalanced personalities." > > > > > > But that's a little problematic because you tend to > > > portray anyone who criticizes or disagrees with you as a > > > "fragile and unbalanced" personality. > > > > > > >, and attempting to *use* them to either exact > > > > "retribution" for grudges you've been carrying for years, or > > > > to support fantasy ideas about enlightenment or the spiritual > > > > process you've been clinging to for years. > > > > > > And this is pure fantasy that even you are aware is not > > > true. That you keep pushing this absurd notion in an > > > attempt to get back at your critics leads some of us to > > > wonder whether the "fragile and unbalanced" personality > > > is you. > > > > > >
