--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater <no_reply@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" <raunchydog@> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ <no_reply@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Name: Doctor Dumbass.
> > > Rank: not usually (smells armpits reflexively).
> > > Serial #: OK, I'll take 37 through 74.
> > > 
> > > Responz: Judee, Judee, Judee...(though you can't hear the cary grant in 
> > > it) - you have firmly claimed the stage, and I graciously yield to 
> > > you...sotto voce (hey, that's enough with the hook, guys...she's got the 
> > > floor...cheesus...)
> > > 
> > 
> > Welcome aboard. Do you prefer being called Doc, Doctor or Dumbass? Rank 
> > armpits...good one. It appeals to my grade school sense of humor.
> 
> Any bets The Dr is male? No woman would give herself the handle "dumbass". 
> Just not possible. Or maybe he means dum bass.
> > 

Ann, Doc is a guy. His name says to me he's secure in his own self-worth and 
doesn't mind laughing at himself. He even invites us to laugh along with him. I 
like that about him. 

You're right. Women are not likely to adopt names implying "dumb." Most women 
don't choose a handle to make a statement about who they are. But a few of us 
who do, are likely to choose bad girl names, such as raunchydog or "Pussy 
Riot." It's an in your face way of saying "We are women, we will not be 
censored, deal with it." 

"Pussy Riot" is a Russian feminist punk-rock band based in Moscow. They got 
into trouble with the Russian government recently for protesting Vladimir Putin 
and the Russian Orthodox Church in Moscow's Cathedral of Christ the Savior. 
Three women in the group were charged with hooliganism. They are now serving 
two years in prison.

Thank goodness Rick and Alex have minimum rules for censorship. It keeps the 
place lively. I've been following the "Pussy Riot" story. Here's the latest: 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mark-levine/pussy-riot-verdict-guilty_b_1798040.html

> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ <no_reply@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > dear authfriend, it is far easier to build a nice new home, than to 
> > > > > continually attempt to fix another's that is shoddy, and always in 
> > > > > need of repair - kindly, The Good Doctor. in SBAL it says you can 
> > > > > tell by the outside of a dwelling, the consciousness of the 
> > > > > inhabitants.
> > > > 
> > > > Doc, although I addressed Barry directly, it was not in an
> > > > attempt to "fix" him, simply to correct his assertions for
> > > > the record.
> > > > 
> > > > And if you'll forgive me, while your observations are
> > > > interesting, it's generally not considered good form for a
> > > > newbie to a forum to instruct its members in how to conduct 
> > > > themselves. Stick around, participate in conversations, get
> > > > to know the other members, absorb some of the context of
> > > > the group and its dynamics. Then you'll be in a better
> > > > position to offer advice.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote:
> > > > > > <snip>
> > > > > > > WHY he "seemed normal" was that he *joined them* in their online
> > > > > > > harassment and persecution of the woman in question. It was more
> > > > > > > important to them to "get" the woman they collectively disliked 
> > > > > > > than to notice that he was in a fragile mental state, and in need
> > > > > > > of *help* in dealing with his psychological problems, not in
> > > > > > > acting them out.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Does any of this sound *familiar* to Fairfield Life members?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Only by way of your posts pretending that it happens here.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > This shit is dangerous, people. You're messing with fragile
> > > > > > > and unbalanced personalities
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > You mean to say "people who *in my opinion* are fragile
> > > > > > and unbalanced personalities."
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > But that's a little problematic because you tend to
> > > > > > portray anyone who criticizes or disagrees with you as a
> > > > > > "fragile and unbalanced" personality.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > >, and attempting to *use* them to either exact
> > > > > > > "retribution" for grudges you've been carrying for years, or
> > > > > > > to support fantasy ideas about enlightenment or the spiritual
> > > > > > > process you've been clinging to for years.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > And this is pure fantasy that even you are aware is not
> > > > > > true. That you keep pushing this absurd notion in an
> > > > > > attempt to get back at your critics leads some of us to
> > > > > > wonder whether the "fragile and unbalanced" personality
> > > > > > is you.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to