--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Susan" <wayback71@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn <emilymae.reyn@> wrote:
> >
> > Hey now, I'm standing up for Curtis, aren't I :) Â It's O.K. Curtis...your
> > reputation is safe. Â No worries. Â
>
> I'm with you, Emily, and Curtis, on this. Altho most people won't bother to
> spend a minute reading this argumentative, odd stuff (good for them!), my
> guess is that if they did, about 99% would side with Curtis. Thing is, the
> other 1% are the ones making the fuss, the
> noise. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-bsf2x-aeE
________________________________
> > From: Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@>
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 7:23 PM
> > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Eastwooding: "I'm not going to shut up;
> > it's my turn!"
> >
> >
> > Â
> > Curtis - No, it's your formula that's getting jaded, worn-out and painful
> > to watch, you are humiliating yourself - trying to manipulate, deceive,
> > threaten others to stifle discussion here. You know what? I faced the tough
> > initiation to FFL and not for a moment I indulged in your shameless, whiny,
> > drama queenery. Robin did as well, Bob Price did as well.
> >
> > You have cried wolf too many times to be taken seriously. You know why I
> > came after you in January, you started to slander me my trying to twist my
> > innocent tale of that 19 years old trying to cajole me into buying a drink
> > for her on New Year's day. Yet you manipulated everyone into believing I
> > was flooding search engine, I was destroying your online reputation. Your
> > cry wolf strategy of your "online reputation" is getting stale, barn yard
> > stinkish, Curtis, grow some balls or just change your online moniker don't
> > try to shut everyone up here - everyone knows what kind of place FFL is -
> > Robin said it well - don't act like the Moses dare I say Jesus of this list.
> >
> > You know why no one other than Robin, Judy stand up to you - because of
> > these very manipulation, deception, coercion you indulge in when someone
> > calls your bullshit. All of you have is the idiot Steve and the King Baby
> > to support you - your old boy, mid-western clique.
> >
> > Here's a free clue - John Paul is not working out, time to create some
> > other piece of beautiful writing to con the gullible here - just don't get
> > into a debate because you will start looking like the clueless fool you
> > are.Â
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 5:43 PM, curtisdeltablues <curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > >Â
> > >OK so I get the formula. I say something that isn't what I would say and
> > >you dance around why you said them. So it is all good for you even though
> > >I would never say your days are numbered or that I was going to humble you
> > >and would never even mean that which is something I know because I am,
> > >after all, myself.
> > >
> > >You are fucking with me Robin and you got my goat a little and you even
> > >got some troll friends to pile on. And for them perhaps your post was
> > >just perfect. Sorry to spoil your little troll party with my actual POV.
> > >
> > >I read you as a wordy Ravi now Robin. Same intention. You are as
> > >spiteful as Judy and you've had your little fun at my expense. I hope you
> > >are sitting smug in your trollness. Is smells like a barnyard to me.
> > >
> > >If you wanted to "send me up" without being an asshole there were many
> > >ways to do it. Your choosing this way is most telling.
> > >
> > >
> > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" <maskedzebra@> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Admission: some poetic license on: Your days are numbered. And the
> > >> humble thing, that too was hyperbole. I admit to pushing the envelope a
> > >> little there. But still IN THE MAIN my two posts represent your
> > >> fundamental response to Robin Carlsen--inside the polemic of our
> > >> relationship, Curtis. Find some other ones. This is getting fun. Because
> > >> if you cite examples they must be sufficient in their cumulative effect
> > >> to vitiate the essential truth of the two posts. Else MY IRONY HAS
> > >> FAILED.
> > >>
> > >> Good start. Keep going. Find some other ones. These ones separated out
> > >> from the whole seem to suggest Robin was pressing things a little. But
> > >> if you take the GIST of the posts, Curtis, they are you. I could not
> > >> ENTIRELY be sober there; else people WOULD REALLY BELIEVE IT WAS YOU. So
> > >> the exaggeration WAS TO PROTECT YOU.
> > >>
> > >> It all works, Curtis. Robin sending you up, but making sure at the same
> > >> time that in the end it was not you. But yet IT WAS YOU.
> > >>
> > >> Let's keep it going, Curtis.
> > >>
> > >> Robin
> > >>
> > >
> > >> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> > >> <curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" <steve.sundur@>
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > You just don't get it Robin. No one likes to be mispresented, or
> > >> > > > impersonated. I think it 's pretty simple.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > No, YOU don't get it, Steve. That isn't the issue. Curtis is
> > >> > > within his rights to ask Robin to stop. Curtis is not within
> > >> > > his rights (ethically, at any rate) to claim Robin has
> > >> > > misrepresented the kind of thing he might say about Robin.
> > >> >
> > >> > Really? So I have threatened Robin that his days on FFL are numbered?
> > >> > That I will humble him? I have to make a case for how he
> > >> > misrepresented me to get him to stop?
> > >> >
> > >> > You don't get the issue Judy. You are following Robin's lead to coerce
> > >> > me into going point by point to refute his made-up bullshit. As if
> > >> > that is the main point of why it might not be cool to make up shit and
> > >> > sign other people's names.
> > >> >
> > >> > Judy, your eyes are brown on this one. Guess why.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "maskedzebra" <maskedzebra@>
> > >> > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Dear Curtis,
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Take the two instances where I have attempted to represent your
> > >> > > > > voice,
> > >> > > > and specify which passages in either post you feel are untruthful;
> > >> > > > that
> > >> > > > is, you would not say what I have you saying. "There were many
> > >> > > > statements in what you wrote that I wouldn't want anyone to think
> > >> > > > I had
> > >> > > > generated". If there are such statements, this tends to defeat my
> > >> > > > argument. I would like some examples. Once you provide these, I
> > >> > > > will
> > >> > > > arrange--I am sure either Rick and Alex can do this--to head each
> > >> > > > of
> > >> > > > these posts with:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > ROBIN PRETENDS HE IS CURTIS. HE ISN'T REALLY. NONE OF WHAT
> > >> > > > > FOLLOWS IS
> > >> > > > WHAT CURTIS WOULD DREAM OF SAYING. THIS POST HAS NOTHING DO WITH
> > >> > > > CURTIS.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > I am sure this will clear up the problem, won't it, Curtis?
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > You are such a sweet and loveable guy.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Oh, by the way, I do believe I represented your sentiments
> > >> > > > > exactly.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > I would like to hear you refute what I have said so I can
> > >> > > > > imagine how
> > >> > > > I could have been wrong here.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > If you would not have said (in principle) what i have you saying
> > >> > > > > then
> > >> > > > it means the irony did not--to use a Share word--"fly".
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > If you can sincerely show me examples of statements--in either
> > >> > > > post--which are false in their attempt to speak in your voice, I
> > >> > > > need to
> > >> > > > see them. Because, to repeat myself for the third time, it means I
> > >> > > > did
> > >> > > > not succeed in what I attempted.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Now let us love one another, Curtis. I have followed you very
> > >> > > > > closely
> > >> > > > for over a year. What i said in both posts for me was Curtis all
> > >> > > > the
> > >> > > > way. Just not as witty, not as hard-hitting, not as clever, not as
> > >> > > > colorful.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > For me, everything is forever.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Robin
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> > >> > > > curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Do I really have to ask you not to do this very douchey thing
> > >> > > > > > Robin?
> > >> > > > really?
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > OK then I'll ask. Please don't sign my name at the bottom of
> > >> > > > > > straw
> > >> > > > men versions of my POV out of respect for the fact that most of us
> > >> > > > just
> > >> > > > skim posts within our otherwise busy days and it is hard enough to
> > >> > > > keep
> > >> > > > track without this in the mix. There were many statements in what
> > >> > > > you
> > >> > > > wrote that I wouldn't want anyone to think I had generated. If you
> > >> > > > want
> > >> > > > to play fast and lose with accuracy and just assume other people
> > >> > > > will
> > >> > > > keep up, please do it at your expense in the future,not mine. This
> > >> > > > shit
> > >> > > > we put up on the Internet is FOREVER. It carries some
> > >> > > > responsibilities.
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
