--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, khazana108 <no_reply@> wrote: > <snip> > > I already regret having ever made the post. I should have > > listened to Barry. Well, Robin, I suggest we both delete > > our respective dialogues here, and just forget about it, > > yes? It never happened. Were others were quoting our posts, > > we just ask Alex to delete, you agree? I will be waiting > > for your agreement. > > BTW, for the record, you don't "just ask Alex to delete" > somebody else's post because it quotes yours. You can ask > the person who wrote the post quoting it to delete their > post if the quotes really embarrass you. But they don't > have to comply with your request. > > (I'm sure khazana knows this and is just being ironic, but > others here may not realize it.) > > <snip> > > Could be an interesting alternative to the sugar syrup > > initiation rituals certain cliques employ here (you know, the > > love bombing) > > You really have to feel bad for someone so cynical and so > twistedly paranoid that they see one person's compliment > to another person for a good post, or just friendly back- > and-forth, as "sugar syrup initiation rituals" and "love > bombing." > > But maybe this was just ironic mockery of Barry and Curtis. > > Because otherwise, we'd have to call khazana a hypocrite: > > "Share, I admit I lurked a bit while I was away, and I > really noticed that you have developed a voice of your > own. I really liked how you stood for what you had to > say. Bravo!"
So, what is sugar coated in the above quote? I noticed she developed a voice of her own, having her own opinion, trying to avoid cliques, what the hell is sugar coated about noticing it? > "Thanks Barry, and so do I look forward having dialogues > with you. While I was away I read, once in a while (on > my phone), you, I read Xeno, I read Curtis, I read Share." What's sugar coated about saying that I enjoy somebodies dialogues? And what is sugar coated about *stating* whom I read, even without making a judgment (the judgment just being implicit)? Judy, get a life. You are living in lala-land.
