--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, khazana108 <no_reply@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, khazana108 <no_reply@> wrote:
> > <snip>
> > > I already regret having ever made the post. I should have
> > > listened to Barry. Well, Robin, I suggest we both delete
> > > our respective dialogues here, and just forget about it,
> > > yes? It never happened. Were others were quoting our posts,
> > > we just ask Alex to delete, you agree? I will be waiting
> > > for your agreement.
> > 
> > BTW, for the record, you don't "just ask Alex to delete"
> > somebody else's post because it quotes yours. You can ask
> > the person who wrote the post quoting it to delete their
> > post if the quotes really embarrass you. But they don't
> > have to comply with your request.
> > 
> > (I'm sure khazana knows this and is just being ironic, but
> > others here may not realize it.)
> > 
> > <snip>
> > > Could be an interesting alternative to the sugar syrup
> > > initiation rituals certain cliques employ here (you know, the
> > > love bombing)
> > 
> > You really have to feel bad for someone so cynical and so
> > twistedly paranoid that they see one person's compliment
> > to another person for a good post, or just friendly back-
> > and-forth, as "sugar syrup initiation rituals" and "love
> > bombing."
> > 
> > But maybe this was just ironic mockery of Barry and Curtis.
> > 
> > Because otherwise, we'd have to call khazana a hypocrite:
> > 
> > "Share, I admit I lurked a bit while I was away, and I
> > really noticed that you have developed a voice of your
> > own. I really liked how you stood for what you had to
> > say. Bravo!"
> 
> So, what is sugar coated in the above quote? I noticed she 
> developed a voice of her own, having her own opinion, trying
> to avoid cliques, what the hell is sugar coated about
> noticing it?

Let's see *your* examples, khazana. Quotes, please, of
what you're referring to as "sugar syrup initiation
rituals" and "love bombing."

Oh, I forgot. You just make accusations, you don't feel
the need to back them up. That way you can just say
whatever you damn please, whether it's true or not.





> 
> > "Thanks Barry, and so do I look forward having dialogues
> > with you. While I was away I read, once in a while (on
> > my phone), you, I read Xeno, I read Curtis, I read Share."
> 
> What's sugar coated about saying that I enjoy somebodies dialogues? And what 
> is sugar coated about *stating* whom I read, even without making a judgment 
> (the judgment just being implicit)?




 
> 
> Judy, get a life. You are living in lala-land.
>


Reply via email to