Dear feste, It is hard to admit, but I believe you have laid bare the truth about Share--but even more powerfully (and objectively) the truth about authfriend.
I don't believe anyone has a better insight into these two women than yourself. And I envy the feeling you had in knowing you were giving us a kind of revelation--a sense of what is really going on here. The personal correspondence I had with Share entirely validates everything she is saying on FFL--and you have not even seen that correspondence. I think, though, at this time we must have mercy on poor authfriend--Imagine how she is feeling now, feste. I am going to try to reach out to her. I only hope that Share can find it in her heart to forgive her too. What shocked me, Feste, was that I recognized how you had fully you understood everything that was going on in this Share Long matter. I think it a beautiful thing when truth comes out--even though I feel some pity for authfriend--as I know you do now too. If not now, then later. Robin --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <feste37@...> wrote: > > What you omitted here, no doubt "by accident," was the fact that I coined the > moniker Saint Share not in response to the post of hers that you place next > to mine (making my response look as if I am being insensitive to Share), but > to a comment by Emily on that post. This is part of Emily's response: > > âDear Share: You are a gem of a human being. I'm not sure what inspired you > to write this, but you seem the least likely to hurt anyone's "tender > feelings." [end quote] > > I was gently tweaking those who were responding to Share in the way that > Emily did. It is one thing to tweak someone in a post and then drop it (as I > did) but it is quite another to pursue an ugly vendetta against a particular > poster, as you have done for months with Share. You seem so contorted with > rage against her that you cannot think straight. You deliberately interpret > everything she writes in the worst possible light. I have no idea why you do > this, other than the fact that you seem to have a compulsive need to attack, > insult, ridicule, and demean other people. Have you ever considered getting > mental health counseling to find out what is at the root of this obsession? > Your claim that you are merely correcting the dishonesty of others is in my > opinion a smokescreen for something else, some other need that you have. I > wonder what that might be? Regarding Share, she has given you a response that > is far kinder than you deserve, and I think you should now STFU about her. > Find some other outlet for your psychic demons but leave Share alone. > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <feste37@> wrote: > > > > > > Beautifully written, Share. A masterful, mature response. > > > > Unfortunately, a masterfully dishonest response. But feste > > doesn't care about honesty any more than Share does. > > > > > > "This is an apology to anyone whose feelings tender heart [sic] I may have > > hurt. I'm willing to do what I can to make amends. And I'm doing my best > > to develop so that I don't continue hurting people knowingly or > > unknowingly." > > > > --Share Long, July 30, 2012 > > > > "It appears that Saint Share has emerged as our idol and role model > > here at FFL. My guess is that she has been sent, somewhat belatedly, > > by God as a replacement for Stupid Sal, which is definitely an > > improvement. (Saint Share, you may not be familiar with Stupid Sal, > > but she was renowned for being not only, well, stupid, but also for > > the sheer nastiness of her posts.)" > > > > --feste, July 30, 2012 > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote: > > > > > > > > You began misinterpreting me on Sept 9 post 319521 and have continued > > > > to do so up to the present.� But what is the real problem is your > > > > asserting that your opinions, misinterpretations, POVs are the accurate > > > > ones, the truthful ones. > > > > > > > > Now about my alleged dishonesty:� I have never experienced a > > > > situation such as I have had with Robin.� laughinggull wrote > > > > insightfully about changing his opinions.� But for me about Robin, it > > > > has been more even than that.� Since Sept 6 I've been trying to make > > > > sense of all that has happened.� It has been a challenging process to > > > > understand what is going on within me and with him.� Your constant > > > > and vitriolic butting in has merely made this process more > > > > challenging.� At least for me. > > > > > > > > But you have little or no compassion for this.� You don't even have > > > > the common sense understanding that not everyone has the time to check > > > > archives.� Instead you call people like me and Steve lazy.� You > > > > don't recognize that people have imperfect memories.� Add to this > > > > your lack of compassion and what emerges is your calling me a liar > > > > again and again.� And do you really think that all the badgering and > > > > name calling really makes the situation better?� Oh, right, I forgot, > > > > you don't really care about that, do you?� Maybe you're just happy to > > > > have someone other than Barry to attack. > > > > > > > > OTOH, it's > > > > damned if I do, > > > > damned if I don't.� Meaning there's your opposite accusation that I > > > > think I'm all love and light or try to appear that I > > > > am.� Maybe I seem that way to you because I don't get hateful > > > > and vitriolic like you do.� It's called projecting a golden shadow, > > > > BTW. > > > > > > > > About my alleged avoiding of confrontation:� I have 7 posts per day > > > > and lots of interesting people on FFL to respond to.� People whose > > > > opinion I do care about.� I am not going to waste all my posts > > > > replying to you because what is the point?� You are convinced that > > > > you are right and that I'm a liar.� Plus from that first upset you > > > > have been biased towards Robin.� Fine, you've known each other > > > > longer.� You have some strange karma to work out with each other.� > > > > Whatever!� BTW, there's a big difference between being loyal and > > > > being biased.� The latter is not healthy.� > > > > > > > > And if I'm really such a liar, so toxic, so lacking in honesty and > > > > integrity, why would you even want to have any communication with me at > > > > all?� In some ways this is the most baffling question of all. � > > > > > > > > > > > > Now everyone, let's watch the tedious and predictable piling on that > > > > happens. > > > > > > > > > >
