Dear feste, I think there are other women here at fault--not just the witch-like authfriend. Emily has spent many posts analyzing Share--and she is easily as cruel and hateful as authfriend has been. Raunchydog as well. Ann Woelfe Bater cannot escape your perfect judgment either. For the sake of the souls of these other three women I beg you to extend your mercy to them--the mercy of your love and your rather extraordinary sensitivity. Is it possible you could prevail upon Share to allow me to post the evidence of her unhappy martyrdom at my hands? For those letters, they will give a whole side of the story that is missing from the knowledge of everyone at FFL other than Share and myself.
Nothing, I assure you, which would in any way contradict your chivalrous and noble act on behalf of justice and honesty. Share is indeed a brave and honest person--and no matter what these jealous and envious women say, Share has the satisfaction of knowing in her conscience that your verdict of her is the truth. That is what gives me the greatest satisfaction, feste: that share knows there is no difference between your judgment of her and her own judgment of herself. These women do not know--like you do, like I do--that Share's secret experience in her heart is: I am utterly innocent of all this--but I shall allow myself to be a sacrifice for the betterment of these women--and that betterment has finally begun with your post, feste. Thank you, feste. Robin --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <feste37@...> wrote: > > What you omitted here, no doubt "by accident," was the fact that I coined the > moniker Saint Share not in response to the post of hers that you place next > to mine (making my response look as if I am being insensitive to Share), but > to a comment by Emily on that post. This is part of Emily's response: > > âDear Share: You are a gem of a human being. I'm not sure what inspired you > to write this, but you seem the least likely to hurt anyone's "tender > feelings." [end quote] > > I was gently tweaking those who were responding to Share in the way that > Emily did. It is one thing to tweak someone in a post and then drop it (as I > did) but it is quite another to pursue an ugly vendetta against a particular > poster, as you have done for months with Share. You seem so contorted with > rage against her that you cannot think straight. You deliberately interpret > everything she writes in the worst possible light. I have no idea why you do > this, other than the fact that you seem to have a compulsive need to attack, > insult, ridicule, and demean other people. Have you ever considered getting > mental health counseling to find out what is at the root of this obsession? > Your claim that you are merely correcting the dishonesty of others is in my > opinion a smokescreen for something else, some other need that you have. I > wonder what that might be? Regarding Share, she has given you a response that > is far kinder than you deserve, and I think you should now STFU about her. > Find some other outlet for your psychic demons but leave Share alone. > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <feste37@> wrote: > > > > > > Beautifully written, Share. A masterful, mature response. > > > > Unfortunately, a masterfully dishonest response. But feste > > doesn't care about honesty any more than Share does. > > > > > > "This is an apology to anyone whose feelings tender heart [sic] I may have > > hurt. I'm willing to do what I can to make amends. And I'm doing my best > > to develop so that I don't continue hurting people knowingly or > > unknowingly." > > > > --Share Long, July 30, 2012 > > > > "It appears that Saint Share has emerged as our idol and role model > > here at FFL. My guess is that she has been sent, somewhat belatedly, > > by God as a replacement for Stupid Sal, which is definitely an > > improvement. (Saint Share, you may not be familiar with Stupid Sal, > > but she was renowned for being not only, well, stupid, but also for > > the sheer nastiness of her posts.)" > > > > --feste, July 30, 2012 > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote: > > > > > > > > You began misinterpreting me on Sept 9 post 319521 and have continued > > > > to do so up to the present.� But what is the real problem is your > > > > asserting that your opinions, misinterpretations, POVs are the accurate > > > > ones, the truthful ones. > > > > > > > > Now about my alleged dishonesty:� I have never experienced a > > > > situation such as I have had with Robin.� laughinggull wrote > > > > insightfully about changing his opinions.� But for me about Robin, it > > > > has been more even than that.� Since Sept 6 I've been trying to make > > > > sense of all that has happened.� It has been a challenging process to > > > > understand what is going on within me and with him.� Your constant > > > > and vitriolic butting in has merely made this process more > > > > challenging.� At least for me. > > > > > > > > But you have little or no compassion for this.� You don't even have > > > > the common sense understanding that not everyone has the time to check > > > > archives.� Instead you call people like me and Steve lazy.� You > > > > don't recognize that people have imperfect memories.� Add to this > > > > your lack of compassion and what emerges is your calling me a liar > > > > again and again.� And do you really think that all the badgering and > > > > name calling really makes the situation better?� Oh, right, I forgot, > > > > you don't really care about that, do you?� Maybe you're just happy to > > > > have someone other than Barry to attack. > > > > > > > > OTOH, it's > > > > damned if I do, > > > > damned if I don't.� Meaning there's your opposite accusation that I > > > > think I'm all love and light or try to appear that I > > > > am.� Maybe I seem that way to you because I don't get hateful > > > > and vitriolic like you do.� It's called projecting a golden shadow, > > > > BTW. > > > > > > > > About my alleged avoiding of confrontation:� I have 7 posts per day > > > > and lots of interesting people on FFL to respond to.� People whose > > > > opinion I do care about.� I am not going to waste all my posts > > > > replying to you because what is the point?� You are convinced that > > > > you are right and that I'm a liar.� Plus from that first upset you > > > > have been biased towards Robin.� Fine, you've known each other > > > > longer.� You have some strange karma to work out with each other.� > > > > Whatever!� BTW, there's a big difference between being loyal and > > > > being biased.� The latter is not healthy.� > > > > > > > > And if I'm really such a liar, so toxic, so lacking in honesty and > > > > integrity, why would you even want to have any communication with me at > > > > all?� In some ways this is the most baffling question of all. � > > > > > > > > > > > > Now everyone, let's watch the tedious and predictable piling on that > > > > happens. > > > > > > > > > >
