--- In [email protected], Share Long <sharelong60@...> wrote:
>
> Do you think what we are doing now is communicating with or at each other?Â
> And if I'm doing the latter, can you show me an example of where I am and how
> it could be changed to being communicating with you?
>
> Should I therefore be considering my navel as my fourth eye?
No, not your fourth eye. Have you ever heard of navel gazing?
If not, here are a couple of Urban Dictionary definitions:
1. navel-gazing
Engaging in self-absorbed behavior, often to the point of being narcissistic.
If she would stop navel-gazing, she would realize the light had turned green.
2. navel-gazing
Negative or excessive self-contemplation, often the focus is on you and not
others, when making a point or offering an opinion.
Or another definition from Merrian Webster online dictionary:
navelgaz·ing
noun \ˈnā-vəl-ˈgā-ziŋ\
Definition of NAVEL-GAZING
: useless or excessive self-contemplation
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: authfriend <authfriend@...>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 10:46 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily & anyone else interested to
> Judy
>
>
> Â
> --- In [email protected], Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote:
> >
> > Judy, what do you mean by actual communication?
>
> I mean the same thing as Emily meant when she said in her
> response that you and she weren't communicating *with*
> each other but *at* each other.
>
> As to using Windex on your navel, it's a metaphor. You're
> likely to stumble if you take steps without being able to
> see where you're going.
>
> ÃÂ Why is my original post not an example of actual communication?ÃÂ I
> don't think Windex on my navel is the "...next single thing for me to do or
> know for me to be in a state of Divine Grace."ÃÂ But I could be wrong (-:
> >
> > PSÃÂ Thanks for replying.
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: authfriend <authfriend@>
> > To: [email protected]
> > Sent: Monday, December 3, 2012 5:10 PM
> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: 3 ques to Judy Emily & anyone else interested
> >
> >
> > ÃÂ
> > --- In [email protected], Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote:
> > >
> > > 1.ÃÂ Do you think that any benefits can come from Judy Share
> > > and Emily continuing to communicate with each other?
> >
> > Well, Share doesn't engage in communication with Emily and
> > Judy, so there's no such thing as "continuing to communicate"
> > in the first place.
> >
> > > 2.ÃÂ If yes, what do you think are the benefits that can come of it?
> >
> > There's no point in speculating about benefits unless Share
> > becomes willing to engage in actual communication.
> >
> > > 3.ÃÂ What do you think would be a viable next step to move
> > > closer to those benefits with a minimum of what's not
> > > beneficial?
> >
> > Again, the first thing that has to happen is for Share to
> > be willing to engage in actual communication.
> >
> > The post I'm responding to, just for the record, is not an
> > example.
> >
> > > I began to think of these questions while driving to the Dome this
> > > evening.ÃÂ I have not discussed them with anyone.
> > > I look forward to any answers especially to numbers 2 and 3.ÃÂ
> > >
> > > In some ways I don't think the answer to number 1 matters.
> > >
> > > My answers:
> > > 2.ÃÂ I hope that more peace and enjoyment for those on FFL would come
> > > of it.
> > > 3.ÃÂ This post IS my viable next step!
> > > 1.ÃÂ I'm not sure.ÃÂ But I'm open to the possibility of yes.
> > >
> > > I'm hoping for some fun answers too (-:
> >
> > Before you take a next step, use some Windex on your
> > navel. How's that?
> >
> > > Thank you everyone for your time and thoughts and caring.
> > >
> >
>
