--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, khazana108 <no_reply@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, khazana108 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, khazana108 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" <maskedzebra@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > <snip> > > > > > > One thing we know, khazana: psychology and psychiatry > > > > > > have penetrated the mystique of mental illness. Two > > > > > > thousand years ago, God (as Jesus) seemed to indicate > > > > > > it was caused by demons; well we know he was wrong. > > > > > > > > > > You do? Then you changed your mind rather abruptly, one > > > > > might say. > > > > > > > > Right, the 25-plus years it took him to do it is just the > > > > blink of an eye, isn't it, khazana? > > > > > > What are you talking about? Not even a month ago he defended > > > the existence of demons. > > > > Read it again, khazana. Pay attention to the context. > > Nope <sight> I read it several times, and I am not really > talking to you here, I am talking to Robin, so STFU, and > leave it to him if he wants to respond or not.
(What does "<sight>" mean here? Appears to be gibberish.) Don't tell me what I may or may not comment on. This is a public forum, and I don't give a rusty nail who you think you're talking to. And obviously Robin can respond or not as he chooses. You are getting WAAAAAAY above yourself here, khazana. You aren't that smart and you're seriously lacking in insight, plus which you have your difficulties with English, as I've pointed out before, and you all too often lose track of the context of a post or don't get it in the first place. You are not in a position to lay down the law to anyone about anything. > > > > > > Starbucks invitation still stands. > > > > > > > > > > Look, I wouldn't mind if it was close by. But I think that > > > > > you should have understanding if people who have been hurt > > > > > by you in the past, resist meeting you. In this case, > > > > > challenging them, or putting any kind of psychological > > > > > pressure on them would surely be detrimental to your > > > > > purpose. > > > > > > > > He's done neither. It's an invitation, an offer, to anyone > > > > who genuinely wants to know whether he has changed. > > > > > > Yet, he posted it in the form of a challenge, and that is > > > very inappropriate. > > > > Very much au contraire. He did not post it in the form of a > > challenge. > > That's debatable. It was repeated by you and several others > here as a challenge, and still is. So, own up to it. It was not repeated by me here as a challenge, and I don't recall anyone else doing so. You either misread something, or you're lying. Prove me wrong. Quote the posts.
