--- In [email protected], Share Long <sharelong60@...> wrote: > > Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaak! Too late! I already replied to RD. But what the heck > stung her about John Newton for God's sake?! Has she even met the man?! > No, I think it's what I say at the end of my reply to her. She made John > Newton wrong to make me wrong. And we all know why the women want to make > me wrong. So you and them can continue to be right right RIGHT. > Pathetic! What are they so insecure about?  > > > And why the heck does he scare you, Robin? Or are you being ironic?  Â
I SAID: "just a LITTLE, Share. And that fear may go soon anyways. Please don't misquote me: to say "John scares me" is quite different from saying: John scares me JUST A LITTLE. > BTW, I said it was a NEW low for Emily and Raunchy. Not so new for Ravi, > right? As far as I am concerned, Ravi is just full of hate--especially for strong and loving women. If he likes you (and you are a woman), that means you're weak and pathetic. Dr Salyavin has provided us with a nifty diagnostic summation anyhow. I agree with him. Jesus. I hope I am not losing it again. Much love and over and out. Robin > ________________________________ > From: Robin Carlsen <maskedzebra@...> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 12:41 PM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: to Emily about extremely polarized thinking > > >  > > > --- In [email protected], "raunchydog" <raunchydog@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote: > > > > > > Emily I think the main cult characteristics are thinking the cult and its > > > leader are almost all positive. AND what I've come to think is an even > > > more telling indicator of cultishness, thinking that those who don't > > > agree with the cult and its leader are almost all negative. So when the > > > writing of a FFL person expresses such extremely polarized thinking, then > > > I think that person is fundamentally aligned with the group I've been > > > calling wts. > > > > > > > A telling indicator of cluelessness is when a whole lot of people agree > > with each other about your behavior, you think there's something wrong with > > them and not yourself. Then, rather than consider it a gift from the > > universe that an entire group of people have given you exactly the same > > feedback, you dismiss them as a "cult" (an utterly laughable > > rationalization) and then run off to "healers" to validate your > > cluelessness. Healing in right in front of your face. Refusing to see it is > > what needs healing. > > > > > > > > For example, Judy has labeled me the most toxic person AND labeled > > > Robin's WTS intentions the absolute highest and purest. I think these > > > phrases indicate extremely polarized thinking as expressed by the use of > > > verbal superlatives. > > > > > > > > > The problem with such extremely polarized thinking IMO is that it totally > > > misses an essential truth about us human beings, which is that we are all > > > a mix of positive and negative and that most of us are mostly positive > > > with a a glitch or two thrown in to keep us embodied and growing. And > > > some of us have more and or bigger glitches. > > > > > > Another essential truth is that we humans are going to make mistakes > > > whether our glitches are big or little, few or many. In regards to this > > > I have also noticed that a big feature of extremely polarized > > > thinking is that it does not allow for making mistakes, learning from > > > them and forgiveness. This too I think is very harmful. > > > > > > As far as I'm > > > concerned it's up to you to decide if you're a member of wts. I'm only > > > weighing in on this because you and others are STILL bringing it up! > > > BTW this is another indicator of cultishness IMO because it too has an > > > element of being extreme in its expression. Also BTW I keep saying IMO > > > to indicate that I realize what I'm saying is only my opinion based on my > > > observations. Nothing more. > > > > > > > > > Of all the wts people I think you're pretty fluid in your thinking. But > > > you still are sometimes extreme in the negative direction towards me and > > > towards other non wts people like Barry. Often I think your negativity > > > is expressed cleverly and pseudo playfully. Nonetheless the extreme > > > negativity underneath is discernible. And as I say above, this > > > extremely polarized thinking in the negative direction has become for me > > > the clearest indication of someone's being in the group I call wts. > > > > > > > > > PS A very recent example of your extremely negative thinking about > > > me: I made no judgement about Raunchy's grand daughter. I was > > > expressing an opinion about the BENEFICIAL effect I thought John Newton's > > > work would have on Raunchy and the people in her life. IMO both you and > > > Raunchy reached a new low with those posts.  > > > > > > > Who me, new lows? What about Gopi Boy? "Ravi called Newton "fucking > > delusional," but he didn't get a gauntlet (or even a guantlet) thrown at > > him either." > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/328870 > > > > BTW if John Newton, himself hadn't thought the "fainting goat" riff was > > humorous, I'd wonder even more than I do about his bona fides. > > Don't bite, Share. She's just trying to get back at you. You stung her. I > kinda like that. With Emily, I'd say just FO. You're good, Share. John scares > me just a little. And that's fine too. > > >
