How do you know it was a vision of your past life? It might even have been some genetic memory.
On 12/30/2012 10:06 AM, Michael Jackson wrote: > Bbbbbbut...wha wha wha what if we had us some visions of our past lives? What > do we think then? (Happened to me at MIU - he he!) > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Ann <awoelfleba...@yahoo.com> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2012 9:30 AM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Lincoln > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@...> wrote: >> >> >> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" <awoelflebater@> wrote: >>> >>> >>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, srijau@ <no_reply@> wrote: >>>> PVR Narasimha Rao says that it looks like Lincoln is re-incarnated right >>>> now based on the birth chart of a well-known individual but I would >>>> imagine that person does not know it or believe it himself. >>> So then what does it matter? >> >> Who says it matters ? > "Who says", you ask? Why, the people who take the time and trouble to > conjecture on such things obviously think it matters. Seems a complete waste > of time to me. No one could ever prove something like this and even if > someone was Lincoln in one life it has no bearing on who they are currently, > what they remember, what they will do in this new body. How does one possibly > come up with these theories anyway? Much better to figure out who we are in > this lifetime since there isn't even a way to prove we live multiple, > reincarnated lives and all we really have is the 'what's happenin' now'. It > never ceases to astound me the things people think up to spend their time > pursuing. Lincoln, my ass. > > It's a simply fact that people die and later gets a new body. Same will > happen to you, so "make hay when the sun shines" :-) >> >> My God, some of you live in a dream world. Assertions are made and not a >> hope in Hell of proving anything. Lincoln one day, some bum the next. All in >> a day's work. >>>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <noozguru@> wrote: >>>>>> Scorsese in his commentary on "Gangs of New York" talked about Lincoln >>>>>> not being a popular as our school history books would have made out. >>>>>> Some of those facts come out in the film. Similarly his HBO series >>>>>> "Boardwalk Empire" mirrors much of the corruption we see in modern day >>>>>> politics. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'll get around to seeing "Lincoln" probably the way I watched "The Dark >>>>>> Night Rises" on Bluray as I did last night. First off I was pissed that >>>>>> the was mostly 16:9 instead of 2:35:1. Gives me pause to ever rent >>>>>> another WB title again. Second, the story seemed to telegraph to the >>>>>> audience that it is bad to go up against the rich and be for the >>>>>> people. That seemed to be some social engineering that wasn't needed. >>>>>> Afterward I found a Netflix indie to wash my palette. >>>>> >>>>> The incarnation of Lincoln is today a highly developed individual living >>>>> in Washington DC were he works for the government. I wouldn't be >>>>> surprised if Scorsese, a long-time TM meditator, interviewed "Lincoln". >>>>> > >
