Is it that one can get there faster through meditation...or is it meditation is 
more easily accessible than to going backpacking? 

When I walk dogs, I enter a similar state. So maybe I prefer a walking 
meditation.

******************



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn  wrote:
>
> Yes, I get to this state of mind backpacking as well, and at the beach, and 
> this summer, while camping and hiking in Utah.  Once I get there, which 
> takes several days sometimes (faster backpacking), it stays with me during 
> the trip.  I always try to bring the state back to my real life, but I can 
> never maintain it long - within hours or a day or two, it's gone.  
> Meditation gets you there faster, no? 
> 
> 
> 
> >________________________________
> > From: Carol 
> >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> >Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2013 10:38 AM
> >Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Challenge: Talk about the issue, not the people 
> >who brought it up - to Jim
> > 
> >
> >  
> >Jim stated: "It is anything but a static state, first experienced as always 
> >being grounded in the Self, or permanent silence. Once a person is 
> >established in Silence within, the enlightenment begins to "infect" 
> >everything else. The Silence within can no longer be overshadowed, 
> >destroyed, or disrupted. Sounds crazy, huh?:-)"
> >
> >Actually it sounds pretty nice. And it reminds me of my state of mind/body 
> >when I backpack. One of my goals when I backpack is to bring that state 
> >packing back with me when I have to re-enter the modern world. 
> >
> >One of my mindfulness mentors has encouraged me to "touch the silence" 
> >daily. 
> >
> >************
> >
> >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@  wrote:
> >>
> >> It is anything but a static state, first experienced as always being 
> >> grounded in the Self, or permanent silence. Once a person is established 
> >> in Silence within, the enlightenment begins to "infect" everything else. 
> >> The Silence within can no longer be overshadowed, destroyed, or disrupted. 
> >> Sounds crazy, huh?:-)
> >> 
> >> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Carol"  wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Jim...are you serious when you say you are enlightened?  When I've read 
> >> > a poster on FFL claim enlightenment, I've always taken it as a sarcasm.
> >> > 
> >> > Do certain people on FFL believe they have reached enlightenment?
> >> > 
> >> > ***********
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@  wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > LOL - Gotcha!! ...and I told you I had a naughty side, but you just 
> >> > > don't listen, do ya?...Let's try it again -- HEY BARRY, I AM 
> >> > > ENLIGHTENED, AND DON'T YOU **EVER** FORGET IT!!!:-)
> >> > > 
> >> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@  wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > I grew up, and moved on. Too bad you did not, though 
> >> > > > > you can be lead through life however you choose. Yes, 
> >> > > > > I AM ENLIGHTENED, BARRY, AND DON'T YOU 
> >> > > > > **EVER** FORGET IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!:-)
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > I *can't* forget it, Jimbo, because I never believed
> >> > > > it in the first place. Neither did *anyone else* on
> >> > > > this forum. The only people you've been able to convince
> >> > > > that you were enlightened were on Batgap, and you could
> >> > > > convince those people that the moon was made of green
> >> > > > cheese. :-)
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > And again, I'm inviting anyone who disagrees with me
> >> > > > about Jim's "enlightened" status, and who believes it,
> >> > > > to chime in and agree with me. 
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > Didn't you NOTICE the last few times I mentioned this,
> >> > > > and no one did? If you didn't, it might suggest that
> >> > > > you have a learning diability. Just sayin'...  :-)
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808"  wrote:
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@  wrote:
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Oh salyavin808, I am incredibly sorry I have not given 
> >> > > > > > > > your's and Barry's and MJ's victimization the full respect, 
> >> > > > > > > > adoration and drama it deserves! 
> >> > > > > > > > 
> >> > > > > > > > Damn, were you ever spanked by mommy, or daddy? Should we 
> >> > > > > > > > add that to the list?? Did you ever drop a quarter and it 
> >> > > > > > > > rolled under a sofa, and you couldn't get at it? THAT'S 
> >> > > > > > > > going on the list TOO!
> >> > > > > > > > 
> >> > > > > > > > Hey, are you political? If so, please send me the number 
> >> > > > > > > > of times YOUR CANDIDATE lost! I am so ON it!
> >> > > > > > > > 
> >> > > > > > > > I bleed for you guys. Geez, the abuses and harm and just 
> >> > > > > > > > plain Medieval TORTURE you, and Barry, and MJ have suffered 
> >> > > > > > > > at the hands of the TMO and Maharishi!!! OMG, The Holocaust 
> >> > > > > > > > pales in comparison!
> >> > > > > > > > 
> >> > > > > > > > MY VAST, UNENDING APOLOGIES TO ALL OF YOU HAPLESS, 
> >> > > > > > > > BROKEN SOULS!!! Good GOD, what was I thinking?!?! 
> >> > > > > > > 
> >> > > > > > > Cognitive dissonance. Fascinating.
> >> > > > > > 
> >> > > > > > And almost completely unaware of it. All while
> >> > > > > > considering himself enlightened. 
> >> > > > > > 
> >> > > > > > Hasn't it been fascinating to see the TMers'
> >> > > > > > refusal to deal with the actual issue here, and
> >> > > > > > their utter reliance on "Kill the messenger"
> >> > > > > > demonization instead?
> >> > > > > > 
> >> > > > > > I have to believe that the reason is that they
> >> > > > > > are still so guruwhipped that they're AFRAID to
> >> > > > > > say things about the TMO or Maharishi that will
> >> > > > > > be perceived as "negative." They are probably
> >> > > > > > so superstitious that they think Bad Things
> >> > > > > > will happen to them if they do. :-)
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> > 
> >
> >
>


Reply via email to