--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008  wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, srijau@  wrote:
> > >
> > > there [sic] are nothing when compared to Maharishi and 
> > > what he has done.
> > 
> > Maharishi's mission is unique because he had the power, 
> > love and dedication and was sent in a moment of human 
> > history when mankind was on the verge of the big leap 
> > forward. He made mankind take the jump, but not 
> > singlehandedly, without the work of other Masters 
> > preceding him mankind would not be ready.
> 
> Stop, stop, for God's sake (hey, these guys probably
> believe in one, even if I don't) STOP!
> 
> My optometrist has warned me that all the "eyerolling"
> I do while reading FFL is having adverse effects on
> my vision. :-)
> 
> This really takes the cake. HOW could anyone possibly
> believe this stuff, about someone so relatively insig-
> nificant and Almost Forgotten Already as Maharishi?
> 
> I think that there must be a one-for-one relationship
> between the amount of fear that a person has about being
> insignificant and cosmically unimportant *themselves*,
> and the amount of significance and importance those
> poor people project onto spiritual teachers or others
> whom they identify with. In their minds, the higher the
> imaginary pedestal they put Maharishi (or whatever guru
> or teacher or public figure they're groupies for) on, 
> the higher *they* become. 
> 
> Weird stuff, if you ask me. But whatever floats their
> boats. Me, I'll continue to think that he was just a
> garden-variety narcissist who would never have been
> remembered for much of anything by much of anyone if
> it hadn't been for the Beatles. People who made them-
> selves feel more significant and important by identifying
> with *them* just transferred that fallacious reasoning
> to Maharishi, and now make themselves feel more signif-
> icant and important by identifying with him. 
> 
> And *what* exactly, are they identifying with? A guy 
> who made up a beginner's technique of meditation, had
> some initial success with it, and then pissed it all
> away with flights of fantasy, delusion, grandiosity,
> and madness, leaving today's TM organization unable
> to get anyone to learn TM *unless someone else pays
> for it for them*, like some guvmint or the DLF. They
> couldn't market TM successfully on a standalone basis
> in the meditation "marketplace" if they tried. 
> 
> Some "accomplishment," for someone they consider more
> important than Rama, Krishna, and Buddha (two of whom
> never even existed). 
> 
> The ludicrousness of believing that Maharishi is in
> any way important to planet Earth makes my eyes roll
> so much that I fear my optometrist is going to be 
> very worried indeed. :-)

Don't worry, if you have any difficulties I can suggest a specialist.
> 
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008  wrote:
> >
> > 
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, srijau@  wrote:
> > >
> > > there are nothing when compared to Maharishi and what he has done.
> > 
> > Maharishi's mission is unique because he had the power, love and dedication 
> > and was sent in a moment of human history when mankind was on the verge of 
> > the big leap forward. He made mankind take the jump, but not 
> > singlehandedly, without the work of other Masters preceding him mankind 
> > would not be ready.
> >
>


Reply via email to