--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > Yes certainly, our experience and the science shows us that the immediate > urgent priority for world peace is to join the large group meditation in > Fairfield. For only 2000 meditating in large group in Fairfield will bring > spiritual security to the world and defuse the precarious escalation of > conflict in all the world. It's very clear. The Domes are a really nice and > effective place to meditate. Don't miss out. Now is not the time to miss > meditation or be out of the Domes. > -Buck in the Dome > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > > > Yes, me thinks you people have little, no, or poor idea > > > what is going on here and just do not appreciate what > > > we have here with these Golden Domes. > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Domes > > > > Isn't it possible that "we people" understand *completely* > > what "you people" BELIEVE that you have "going on there," > > and just aren't fuckin' interested? > > > > For example, I understand *fully* the kind of reinforced > > sense of community and "belonging" that comes from twice > > a day, in any weather, comes from traipsing across town > > to do something supremely silly (like bouncing on your > > butt and calling it "flying") with other people. Some > > people get this same sense of community by painting their > > faces and bodies odd colors and going to football games. > > > > Others of us don't really feel the need for some sense > > of extended community or "belonging," and/or we really > > don't believe that the TMSP is particularly beneficial > > to individuals, and *certainly* don't believe that it is > > beneficial to the world or to the environment. > > > > If we honestly don't BELIEVE those things, what could > > *possibly* be our motivation to want to "join you in the > > domes?" > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > > > > > Me thinks you people do not appreciate what is here. > > > > -Buck in the Dome > > > >
Nor appreciate the sacrifices we've made to have it. > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Yes context is everything and Krishnamurti's got nothing to do with > > > > > this. We hazard our all if we are here to have a group meditation > > > > > and a facility must be kept which takes some organization for the > > > > > general good of honest and enlightened citizens to work well. For > > > > > where two or three are gathered in meditation there is the Unified > > > > > Field in their midst. One hopes for the best and the best in people > > > > > on earth. > > > > > -Buck in the Dome > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > That doesn't invalidate the fact that he had a genuine mystical > > > > > > experience > > > > > > you idiot - even your Ramana Maharishi is now enjoying with the > > > > > > heavenly > > > > > > ladies, the last I heard from him . Based upon Krishnamurti's story > > > > > > and > > > > > > even Amma's - they both have had genuine mystical experience whereas > > > > > > someone like like Maharishi, based upon what I have read so far, > > > > > > clearly > > > > > > hasn't had. So in Maharishi's case it's all what he has learned - he > > > > > > clearly was a very good speaker, good knowledge of the concepts he > > > > > > probably > > > > > > learned from someone else. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Yifu wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > ** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's also a well known fact that Krishnamurti had a long secret > > > > > > > intimate > > > > > > > relationship with his best friend's - only the best friend (Raja) > > > > > > > was too > > > > > > > dumb to know it! So much for "here to here". Looks like a lot of > > > > > > > here to > > > > > > > there stuff. > > > > > > > http://www.museumsyndicate.com/images/1/9.jpg > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well that's a POV, but Om what the hell does Krishnamurti > > > > > > > > > know? > > > > > > > > > We've got work to do to get people from here to there. > > > > > > > > > -Buck in the Dome > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, Buck, Maharhisi said Krishnamurti was in unity. > > > > > > > > Specifically he > > > > > > > said 'too far gone in Unity'. Krishnamurti slipped into it, but > > > > > > > never > > > > > > > really knew how he got there, which was why he had such > > > > > > > difficulty getting > > > > > > > people to understand what he was talking about. That's because > > > > > > > with > > > > > > > enlightenment, you do not get people from here to there, that is > > > > > > > not how it > > > > > > > works, but unfortunately everyone interprets the journey of > > > > > > > enlightenment > > > > > > > from 'here to there' rather than from 'here to here'; in fact it > > > > > > > is not > > > > > > > even that, it is just 'here'. Maharishi understood this, as did > > > > > > > other > > > > > > > teachers, that you have to find a way to trick the mind into > > > > > > > thinking that > > > > > > > teaching is going to take you from some state to another state, > > > > > > > presumably > > > > > > > a better one, to motivate the mind to engage in the practices > > > > > > > that will > > > > > > > lead to dissolving the delusion that enlightenment is something > > > > > > > different > > > > > > > from what you are already experiencing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
