--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson wrote: > > You lost me there - what has been proven?
That no matter how many thousands of people and no matter how many hundreds of years people practice TM and the siddhis we will not achieve world peace or coherence as a result. This is just me, being very unscientific, merely logical, in this assessment. So hence my advice to save your money, odds are against the ME. > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Ann > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Saturday, February 9, 2013 9:37 AM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The top five regrets... > > > Â > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson wrote: > > > > OK if you believe this, any idea how long you would have to have a group of > > 2000 in Fairfield to have this effect? How long you would have to have a > > group of 10,000 to actually create world peace? > > > > Cuz if you can offer a time frame and I ever become a billionaire I will > > support both groups just to prove to you it won't happen thru yogic flying. > > Dear MJ, I think you can save your money, it has already been proven! Now if > you want to know what you could do with an extra million or so, just let me > know. > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Buck > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > Sent: Saturday, February 9, 2013 7:54 AM > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The top five regrets... > > > > > > ÃÂ > > Yes certainly, our experience and the science shows us that the immediate > > urgent priority for world peace is to join the large group meditation in > > Fairfield. For only 2000 meditating in large group in Fairfield will bring > > spiritual security to the world and defuse the precarious escalation of > > conflict in all the world. It's very clear. The Domes are a really nice > > and effective place to meditate. Don't miss out. Now is not the time to > > miss meditation or be out of the Domes. > > -Buck in the Dome > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > > > > > Yes, me thinks you people have little, no, or poor idea > > > > what is going on here and just do not appreciate what > > > > we have here with these Golden Domes. > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Domes > > > > > > Isn't it possible that "we people" understand *completely* > > > what "you people" BELIEVE that you have "going on there," > > > and just aren't fuckin' interested? > > > > > > For example, I understand *fully* the kind of reinforced > > > sense of community and "belonging" that comes from twice > > > a day, in any weather, comes from traipsing across town > > > to do something supremely silly (like bouncing on your > > > butt and calling it "flying") with other people. Some > > > people get this same sense of community by painting their > > > faces and bodies odd colors and going to football games. > > > > > > Others of us don't really feel the need for some sense > > > of extended community or "belonging," and/or we really > > > don't believe that the TMSP is particularly beneficial > > > to individuals, and *certainly* don't believe that it is > > > beneficial to the world or to the environment. > > > > > > If we honestly don't BELIEVE those things, what could > > > *possibly* be our motivation to want to "join you in the > > > domes?" > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Me thinks you people do not appreciate what is here. > > > > > -Buck in the Dome > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes context is everything and Krishnamurti's got nothing to do with > > > > > > this. We hazard our all if we are here to have a group meditation > > > > > > and a facility must be kept which takes some organization for the > > > > > > general good of honest and enlightened citizens to work well. For > > > > > > where two or three are gathered in meditation there is the Unified > > > > > > Field in their midst. One hopes for the best and the best in > > > > > > people on earth. > > > > > > -Buck in the Dome > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That doesn't invalidate the fact that he had a genuine mystical > > > > > > > experience > > > > > > > you idiot - even your Ramana Maharishi is now enjoying with the > > > > > > > heavenly > > > > > > > ladies, the last I heard from him . Based upon Krishnamurti's > > > > > > > story and > > > > > > > even Amma's - they both have had genuine mystical experience > > > > > > > whereas > > > > > > > someone like like Maharishi, based upon what I have read so far, > > > > > > > clearly > > > > > > > hasn't had. So in Maharishi's case it's all what he has learned - > > > > > > > he > > > > > > > clearly was a very good speaker, good knowledge of the concepts > > > > > > > he probably > > > > > > > learned from someone else. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Yifu wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's also a well known fact that Krishnamurti had a long secret > > > > > > > > intimate > > > > > > > > relationship with his best friend's - only the best friend > > > > > > > > (Raja) was too > > > > > > > > dumb to know it! So much for "here to here". Looks like a lot > > > > > > > > of here to > > > > > > > > there stuff. > > > > > > > > http://www.museumsyndicate.com/images/1/9.jpg > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well that's a POV, but Om what the hell does Krishnamurti > > > > > > > > > > know? > > > > > > > > > > We've got work to do to get people from here to there. > > > > > > > > > > -Buck in the Dome > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, Buck, Maharhisi said Krishnamurti was in unity. > > > > > > > > > Specifically he > > > > > > > > said 'too far gone in Unity'. Krishnamurti slipped into it, but > > > > > > > > never > > > > > > > > really knew how he got there, which was why he had such > > > > > > > > difficulty getting > > > > > > > > people to understand what he was talking about. That's because > > > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > enlightenment, you do not get people from here to there, that > > > > > > > > is not how it > > > > > > > > works, but unfortunately everyone interprets the journey of > > > > > > > > enlightenment > > > > > > > > from 'here to there' rather than from 'here to here'; in fact > > > > > > > > it is not > > > > > > > > even that, it is just 'here'. Maharishi understood this, as did > > > > > > > > other > > > > > > > > teachers, that you have to find a way to trick the mind into > > > > > > > > thinking that > > > > > > > > teaching is going to take you from some state to another state, > > > > > > > > presumably > > > > > > > > a better one, to motivate the mind to engage in the practices > > > > > > > > that will > > > > > > > > lead to dissolving the delusion that enlightenment is something > > > > > > > > different > > > > > > > > from what you are already experiencing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
