Listening to Buck stories - Priceless
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck"  wrote:
>
> Yes, having not gotten back to Fairfield certainly should be one of
the top five regrets-in-life: to have not made it back to Fairfield to
help with the group meditation.  Pitiable.
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck"  wrote:
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
> > >
> > > ah Buck, loving your undefeated enthusiasm, heading off to Dome
now,
> > have fun (-:
> > >
> > >
> > Yes, -Buck
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > >  From: Buck
> > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: Saturday, February 9, 2013 6:54 AM
> > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The top five regrets...
> > >
> > >
> > > Â
> > > Yes certainly, our experience and the science shows us that the
> > immediate urgent priority for world peace is to join the large group
> > meditation in Fairfield. For only 2000 meditating in large group in
> > Fairfield will bring spiritual security to the world and defuse the
> > precarious escalation of conflict in all the world.  It's very
clear.
> > The Domes are a really nice and effective place to meditate.  Don't
miss
> > out.  Now is not the time to miss meditation or be out of the Domes.
> > > -Buck in the Dome
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck"  wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, me thinks you people have little, no, or poor idea
> > > > > what is going on here and just do not appreciate what
> > > > > we have here with these Golden Domes.
> > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Domes
> > > >
> > > > Isn't it possible that "we people" understand *completely*
> > > > what "you people" BELIEVE that you have "going on there,"
> > > > and just aren't fuckin' interested?
> > > >
> > > > For example, I understand *fully* the kind of reinforced
> > > > sense of community and "belonging" that comes from twice
> > > > a day, in any weather, comes from traipsing across town
> > > > to do something supremely silly (like bouncing on your
> > > > butt and calling it "flying") with other people. Some
> > > > people get this same sense of community by painting their
> > > > faces and bodies odd colors and going to football games.
> > > >
> > > > Others of us don't really feel the need for some sense
> > > > of extended community or "belonging," and/or we really
> > > > don't believe that the TMSP is particularly beneficial
> > > > to individuals, and *certainly* don't believe that it is
> > > > beneficial to the world or to the environment.
> > > >
> > > > If we honestly don't BELIEVE those things, what could
> > > > *possibly* be our motivation to want to "join you in the
> > > > domes?"
> > > >
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck"  wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Me thinks you people do not appreciate what is here.
> > > > > > -Buck in the Dome
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck"  wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yes context is everything and Krishnamurti's got nothing
to do
> > with this.  We hazard our all if we are here to have a group
meditation
> > and a facility must be kept which takes some organization for the
> > general good of honest and enlightened citizens to work well.  For
where
> > two or three are gathered in meditation there is the Unified Field
in
> > their midst.  One hopes for the best and the best in people on
earth.
> > > > > > > -Buck in the Dome
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula 
wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > That doesn't invalidate the fact that he had a genuine
> > mystical experience
> > > > > > > > you idiot - even your Ramana Maharishi is now enjoying
with
> > the heavenly
> > > > > > > > ladies, the last I heard from him . Based upon
> > Krishnamurti's story and
> > > > > > > > even Amma's - they both have had genuine mystical
experience
> > whereas
> > > > > > > > someone like like Maharishi, based upon what I have read
so
> > far, clearly
> > > > > > > > hasn't had. So in Maharishi's case it's all what he has
> > learned - he
> > > > > > > > clearly was a very good speaker, good knowledge of the
> > concepts he probably
> > > > > > > > learned from someone else.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Yifu  wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > **
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > It's also a well known fact that Krishnamurti had a
long
> > secret intimate
> > > > > > > > > relationship with his best friend's - only the best
friend
> > (Raja) was too
> > > > > > > > > dumb to know it! So much for "here to here". Looks
like a
> > lot of here to
> > > > > > > > > there stuff.
> > > > > > > > > http://www.museumsyndicate.com/images/1/9.jpg
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros
> > Anartaxius" wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Well that's a POV, but Om what the hell does
> > Krishnamurti know?
> > > > > > > > > > > We've got work to do to get people from here to
there.
> > > > > > > > > > > -Buck in the Dome
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Well, Buck, Maharhisi said Krishnamurti was in
unity.
> > Specifically he
> > > > > > > > > said 'too far gone in Unity'. Krishnamurti slipped
into
> > it, but never
> > > > > > > > > really knew how he got there, which was why he had
such
> > difficulty getting
> > > > > > > > > people to understand what he was talking about. That's
> > because with
> > > > > > > > > enlightenment, you do not get people from here to
there,
> > that is not how it
> > > > > > > > > works, but unfortunately everyone interprets the
journey
> > of enlightenment
> > > > > > > > > from 'here to there' rather than from 'here to here';
in
> > fact it is not
> > > > > > > > > even that, it is just 'here'. Maharishi understood
this,
> > as did other
> > > > > > > > > teachers, that you have to find a way to trick the
mind
> > into thinking that
> > > > > > > > > teaching is going to take you from some state to
another
> > state, presumably
> > > > > > > > > a better one, to motivate the mind to engage in the
> > practices that will
> > > > > > > > > lead to dissolving the delusion that enlightenment is
> > something different
> > > > > > > > > from what you are already experiencing.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to