OMG - this is SO BAD Miss Obba - how could you make fun of an innocent,
loving, playful baby Krishna !!!

On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 1:07 PM, obbajeeba <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

> **
>
>
> Ravi- The REAL dark meat. :) LMAO!
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula wrote:
> >
> > White Indian..LOL, anyway a plain ol' dark skinned Indian here MJ and
> > mantras are so lame and boring. I would fall asleep - I found more joy in
> > singing and dancing, I still do. The last time I chanted a whole 108
> times
> > because ah, a White Indian/Hindu I loved asked me to and there was no way
> > in hell I was going to say no to her.
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 7:35 AM, doctordumbass@... <
> > no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
> >
> > > **
>
> > >
> > >
> > > I'll answer this as a white "Indian", if that is OK -- Maharishi
> drilled
> > > the point into our heads ceaselessly, that his was a reconfiguration of
> > > knowledge already present.
> > >
> > > He found that by invoking these mantras mentally, using the TM
> technique,
> > > the results were both far stronger, and longer lasting than vocalizing
> the
> > > mantras. In addition, his technique can be practiced by those in the
> West.
> > >
> > > As to being taught that the mantras are meaningless sounds, they are,
> > > unless one lives God Realization. Better to let the students realize
> the
> > > *meaning* of the mantra, over time.
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Spent some time talking to someone who was close to Marshy (a former
> > > governor) and was told that the TM mantras are not meaningless Vedic
> > > sounds, they are Hindu mantras and the practice of TM is actually a
> Hindu
> > > devotional practice of chanting the names of aspects of Goddess. He
> also
> > > said that contrary to what we were were told, in India people speak
> these
> > > bija mantras out loud, sing them to the skies if they so desired.
> Thoughts
> > > on the matter?
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>  
>

Reply via email to