I have to admit it is weird when I'm absent from FFL for some time and return 
to find a discussion about me going on.  Anyway, thank you to both Ann and 
Steve.  I find Carol very reasonable and also thought she missed a crucial 
point of mine.  Which seems like a long time ago and I can't even remember what 
it was (-:

Also want to say that when turq has been going at me the way he has been the 
last few days, I appreciate all the support that's offered by others.  Then 
when Steve comes along in his masculine and gentle way, it reminds me that it's 
ok to be feminine.  That means a lot to me.

BUT...I also really liked when Steve took up for turq.  Because his buddies 
generally take up for turq on the intellectual level, which is fine and good.  
But Steve took up for turq on an emotional level.  And I still believe that 
those with the toughest shells are also those with the softest insides.  
Honestly folks, the turq lives with 3 other adults and a child!  Could he do so 
and be the curmudgeon he often appears to be here?!    




________________________________
 From: seventhray27 <steve.sun...@yahoo.com>
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 9:23 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: David Lynch Is Back to Carol
 

  

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" <awoelflebater@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" steve.sundur@ wrote:
> >
> > 
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" <awoelflebater@> wrote:
> > 
> > > Er, Steve, you seem to be getting a tad defensive here and it seems it
> > is because you have this need to run to somehow divert what you perceive
> > as some sort of attack aimed at Share. I think you should give Share
> > some respect/credibility and the chance to reply and figure out her own
> > dynamics with Carol here. By jumping in like this it makes you look like
> > you don't think Share is capable of a one on one dialogue with someone
> > exploring possibilities of a subject. You have a very hair trigger
> > protective mechanism. Check it out, what are you afraid of?
> > 
> > 
> > I do feel slighted that I was not breast fed, and that my mother
> > probably smoked  during her entire pregnancy with me, and likely my
> > three sisters.  That's what coming to mind right now.
> 
> "Slighted"? Oh, you mean because your mother didn't "protect" you in the womb 
> you are more likely to "protect" others now?! Did you feel like you craved a 
> Marlborough when you emerged?
That would have been a Kent and vodka martini.
> > 
> > As for Carol, I detect a selective bias on her part, and I am just
> > voicing it.  Perhaps I am mistaken, but I have attempted to hi-light in
> > a previous post.  Maybe I am wrong about it
> 
> I think you have an innate protective tendency towards those you feel might 
> be being singled out and challenged. 
Okay, I do get riled up when I see something akin to bullying***  Not that we 
are seeing bullying here, but as a tendency on my part, yes I acknowledge that.

*** 1970's definition in force here.Not a terrible character flaw but in this 
case a grown woman like Share can probably handle whatever Carol is likely to 
bring up in conversation.
Uh, really has nothing to do with Share fighting her own battles.  She doesn't 
need my help in that regard.  I thought Share brought up a salient point that 
Carol chose not to include in here reasons why the eminent Dr. Oz would choose 
to embrace TM.

 I hardly see Carol as some malevolent, unreasonable poster here. 
Nor do I.  But as I said, I thought she chose to selectively consider 
possibilities, choosing not include  perhaps the most reasonable explanation.  
As these things go, I would call it a small infraction,  but I chose to comment 
on it anyway.  And I accept that people might feel I am full of sh*t about it.

Share will probably say otherwise, but I think you should have a little more 
confidence in her ability to respond/deal with interactions here, especially 
with someone as reasonable as Carol.
You will have to take that up with Share.  I think she weighs the cost/reward 
ratio of who she interacts with.  

Personally, I greatly enjoy your contributions here.  
>

 

Reply via email to