Now that you've casually mentioned your "riding crop technique", your words carry extra weight around here, Ann. However, at least one member of our riding party, the one going "dutch", if you catch my drift, is actually looking forward to his next stinging reference to you, so that he may feel your reply in kind...
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" <awoelflebater@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" <steve.sundur@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson <mjackson74@> > > wrote: > > > > > > If Oz was as responsible in his touting of TM as he is of other herbs, > > drugs and procedures where he gives both the pros and cons, he would be > > giving both sides. > > > > > > In fairness, he may not know the crap the TMO does, and he certainly > > may not know what Marshy was. > > > > > > It's a relaxation technique. That's it's primary purpose. And I am > > certain that you would find fault in any discussion that did not arrive > > at what you would consider to be the correct conclusions. > > > > Let's examine the modalities you recommend, although I can't even > > remember what they are. Massage maybe. > > > > Let's take massage. What do you suppose would be the negative effects > > of massage, or mindfulness, or any of the other programs you recommend. > > Just for fun, take a shot at those first. I'll wait. > > Careful Steve you don't, for one moment, want to sound like Barry. Just stay > your sensitive, sweet, sort of gullible self. I'll just ignore that last > sentence and pretend you changed to the wrong 'channel' instead. > > >
