--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In [email protected], off_world_beings > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > --- In [email protected], Ron F <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > Note: forwarded message attached. > > > > > <snip> And we are finding our way to create big groups even > > > > > > so it is not happening > > > > > > so quickly. But we can attribute it to not lack of our > > > > > > efforts but lack of > > > > > > the luck of the world. We have to hide somewhere. So > > > > > > we hide behind the > > > > > > logic that it is the lack of luck of the world that it > > > > > > is not going so fast. > > > > > > There we take refuge. If it is not going fast we have > > > > > > a logic, it is the > > > > > > luck of the world. > > > > > > > > > > > In the excerpt above, can anyone please explain to me what > > > > > MMY is talking about when he says, "We have to hide > > > > > somewhere. So we hide behind the logic..."? Sounds crazy to > > > > > me. > > > > > > > > Caught my eye too. I suspect it's one of his > > > > quasi-gnomic statements that's open to multiple > > > > interpretations. The way I read it, he's saying > > > > there's an explanation that makes sense (the "logic"), > > > > but at the same time, in characterizing it as > > > > "hiding," he's also suggesting that it's an excuse. > > > > > > > > As in: Some of you are mature enough to take > > > > responsibility for the failure without being crushed, > > > > and you don't need the excuse; those of you who > > > > who aren't that mature, here's something you can hide > > > > behind. > > > > > > > > > And the whole tone of the > > > > > message seems like he is protecting the incompetence of those > > > > > in his movement. Or am I missing something? > > > > > > > > He's being more explicit about the failure than > > > > I've seen before, actually, but for whatever > > > > reason he's not lambasting the teachers for it. > > > > >>TurquoiseB > >> Benevolent of him, since the failure is his. >>> > > > > Correct. > > Barry didn't have the guts to respond when I asked > him this; maybe you will, off_world. > > MMY is being explicit about the failure. You and > Barry are blaming him for it. > > But which of these two are you blaming him for? > > 1. He thought it could be done, but he was wrong. > > 2. It *could* have been done, but he failed to do it.>>>
Neither: 3. If it could be done, has he done it the right way? Answer: Half of what he did was genius. Half of what he did was .....well....stupid. This is the Enigma of Maharishi tha Rick often talks about. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
