--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote:
>
> To believe, or not to believe: that is the question: Whether 'tis nobler
> in the mind to believe in the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune,
> or to take arms against a sea of beliefs in "support of nature," and
> disbelieving, benefit from it anyway?
> 
> That's my Shakespearean riff on the things that two types of people here
> might choose to believe about my latest Parisian rap. The simple
> backstory of this rap is that my desire -- or intent, in a Castanedan
> sense -- was to find a relatively inexpensive place to stay when I'm
> first there, in one of the more expensive cities on Earth. It's
> difficult to find hotel rooms for under 100 Euros ($130) a night,
> especially in nice areas. The cheap hotel I'd stayed in before, a
> discovery passed along to me by Robert Crumb, is totally booked up,
> which is understandable because it's a clean (if spartan) hotel in an
> acceptable (if uninteresting) quartier for more like 50 Euros a night.
> 
> But even if that place had been available, all of those hotel bills add
> up, and sadly come out of my own pocket, since I'm a consultant on this
> gig, not an employee. So I went looking for the proverbial Better Deal.
> I tried the big short-term rental agencies, but they couldn't do any
> better than L'Hotel du Mister Natural (not its real name), and wanted
> huge deposits when renting for less than a year. Then a friend
> recommended Airbnb.com, which had some reasonable places with no huge
> deposits, and Craigslist.
> 
> Bingo on the latter. I was perusing its lists of available short-term
> apartments, and stumbled upon one that looked from the headline as if it
> were a misprint. The weekly rate was simply too low, especially for the
> neighborhood. My disbelief only expanded when I clicked on the link and
> saw photos of the place. It was small but clean, impeccably maintained,
> and featuring everything I wanted. So I wrote to the owners, expecting
> them to come back to me saying that the price in the Craigslist ad was a
> typo, and instead they wrote back saying that the place was mine through
> March (which gives me time to search for something more permanent), and
> for 26 Euros a night.
> 
> In Paris you can pay more than that to share a room in a youth hostel
> with eight hippies from Morocco and Eastern Europe who will steal your
> underwear during the night if you don't sleep with one eye open. And for
> that price I get a beautifully decorated studio in a historic building
> in the Marais, a neighborhood I know well, so well that I wasn't even
> looking for places there because I assumed I'd never be able to afford
> them. Go figure.
> 
> Now, back to the Shakespearean aside above. Some folks here, if such as
> stroke of outrageous fortune happened to them, would call it "support of
> nature," and chalk it up to their minds being 10,000X more powerful than
> lesser humans' minds, and to having not skipped a butt-bouncing session
> in years. Heck, they'd chalk up hitting two green lights in a row to
> those Woo Woo causes. :-)
> 
> But none of that applies to me. I'm Off The Program. So WTF?
> 
> Don't get me wrong. I *don't* believe in "support of nature," because
> that would imply either benevolence on the part of sentient beings I
> don't believe exist or the non-sentient intervention of non-personal but
> inviolable "laws of nature" that I suspect -- if they even exist -- are
> FAR too busy running nature to bother with my sorry ass.
> 
> But I *do* believe in "being on a roll," or "being in tune," or, more
> simply, Just Being Lucky. I suspect that this apartment is a combination
> of all three. I would *not* have checked Craigslist if a friend hadn't
> reminded me of it, so that was Just Being Lucky, as was stumbling across
> that ad an hour after it was posted. As for being on a roll, that's been
> happening a LOT lately, ever since the song "Free Man In Paris" got
> stuck in my head a few days ago.
> 
> So what do you guys think? After all, the hardcore TBs here *can't*
> admit that I had "support of nature" on my side, because I'm
> so...so...evil and Off The Program and all. So that's right out. They
> also can't admit that I in any way "deserve" it, because some of them
> believe (and at least one has even said) that what I "deserve" is a long
> stretch in hell for all the things I've said about TM and the TMO and
> Maharishi. So I'm curious as to what they ascribe my good fortune *TO*.
> 
> Me, I'll stick with Just Good Luck. I've had that going for me all my
> life, and in spades. By rights, given the dice-roll of chance, I should
> have been dead twenty times over or living under a bridge somewhere, but
> noooooooo. Instead I've had a remarkably fortunate life. No complaints.
> NONE.
> 
> So what do you think is UP with that?
> 
> It pretty much can't be the benevolence of gods or goddesses or Woo Woo
> Wiseguys looking after me from on high, because I bloody well don't
> believe in them. It's not a "growing integration of mind and body" from
> TM or the TMSP, because I don't believe in that, either, and don't
> practice either.
> 
> I'm gonna go with Dumb Luck, and enjoy my time in the Marais. It's a
> vibrant, lively scene, with lots of wonderful cafes and restaurants and
> clubs, and close to a lot of evening entertainment. Some here of the
> homophobic persuasion might not like it because it's also a big gay
> area, but that never bothered me in Sitges (40% gay) and won't in the
> Marais, either. It'll be a bit longer of a commute to work than I
> wanted, but on a straight Metro line -- no changes -- so that's OK with
> me.
> 
> All in all, I'm jazzed. And suspect that I will continue to be while
> there, literally, because I'll be down the street from one of Paris'
> oldest jazz clubs, where Miles and Coltrane and others played. I'm
> still, in fact, a little incredulous, hardly believing in my own Dumb
> Luck, but it does seem to be happening, so cool.
> 
> Even if some of you manage to convince me that this is all really due to
> "support of nature," that won't make it any cooler. Dumb Luck seems to
> work just as well for me as TMers' "support of nature" does for them,
> and it certainly costs less, both in terms of cash and the amount of
> belief-baggage one has to carry around.
>

Gahna Karmanyo Gathi

Reply via email to