--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" <steve.sundur@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" steve.sundur@ > wrote: > > <snip> > > > Oh, and the sin of snipping. That can always be grounds > > > for immediate dismissal of any points. Because snipping > > > in Judy's book is to hide something, and not for conciseness. > > > (unless she does it) > > > > > > And yes, she does have time, have time, have time for nearly > > > unlimited research, (which we must remember is "research" > > > when she does it, but "internet stalking" when done by > > > someone else) > > > > > > So, all of this, for me, disputes any notion of "honesty" > > > on Judy's part. > > > > Except for the fact that what you say above about > > snipping and research is not true, and you know it's > > not true. > > Truth, for you Judy is often a moving target.
No, Steve, it is not. Why you've suddenly decided that telling whoppers about me is a good tactic, I really don't know. But I'd suggest that you rethink it, because it makes you look even more helplessly stupid than you already do. As Curtis pointed, often > the opportunity for a discussion that yields greater understanding is a > casualty for a different agenda. > > > > Lying about a person isn't a very good way to make a > > case for their being dishonest, now, is it? > > >
