--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... <no_reply@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" <j_alexander_stanley@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" <awoelflebater@> wrote: > > > snip > > > > > > > But I think they do nothing to enhance the environment nor do they > > > > integrate into anything that resembles native Iowa. > > > > > > I think what everyone is waiting for is one of Ann's beautiful > > > pictures of a building "that resembles native Iowa" > > > C'mon Ann, you can do it ! > > > > > > > What could possibly say "native Iowa" more than Gothic chapels and Greek > > revival libraries? > > > Yes, and built with the same motives as the MUM folks' new buildings - to > transform the area into one of new culture and learning, while paying homage > to the past.
Well said. What Nabby and Feste appear to forget is that you can love the Movement and TM and still find the buildings ugly. But from the way Feste is talking he is taking it personally that I find the MUM buildings unattractive. Maybe he was the architect. Were you Feste? >
