dear Buck, I find I cannot quite grasp what is meant by "extraordinary times of community need" in the FFL context. Did such times occur in the past? Something biblical perhaps? Who would determine that such times were upon us? And could such determination be made without undue pressure on any one individual? Speak!
________________________________ From: Buck <dhamiltony...@yahoo.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 5:23 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: FFL Post Count. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" <j_alexander_stanley@...> wrote: > > Curtis did, in fact, overpost, but that's because he kept getting an error on > the website while trying to send his 50th post. Curtis emailed me, and I sent > it on to Rick for him to pass judgment from upon high. Rick let him slide. > > Point of order, spare the rod spoil the writer. 50 posts per week is way more than enough to say what needs to be said. What is anyone saying even with coming close to 50 posts that they couldn't say more judiciously in 30 posts per week? The lack of civility that is endemic too often in posting here is only helped along with the lack of severity in administering the community guidelines. We should all be better here with a 30 post limit exept in extraordinary times of community need. Sincerely, -Buck > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> wrote: > > > > > > -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> wrote: > > (snip) > > > > And it's good to see you here. Clearly the post count > > > > mechanism screwed up, because by my manual count you > > > > only made 50 posts. > > > > > > No, I'm sure something much more nefarious is afoot > > > involving unfairness to the whole group which is only > > > protected by Judy's vigilance. It couldn't be the > > > correction of a simple mistake. > > > > Usually (as Curtis knows) Alex lets us know if there > > has been a mistake, especially when the mistake has > > put a poster at over 50 and Alex has previously > > announced that they'll be out for the next week. > > > > Also note my wording, ignored by Curtis: > > > > "Has Curtis received some special dispensation, *or what*?" > > (emphasis added) > > >
