Judy, what do you want besides an apology from me to Robin about accusing him of psychological rape?
________________________________ From: authfriend <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2013 10:16 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: parsing a la Descartes was HITLER'S VALENTINE --- In [email protected], Share Long <sharelong60@...> wrote: > > Duh, Raunchy, maybe too many skinny gymnastic events? > Meaning, the obesity epidemic in the US?! The rise of > diabetes, even among children?! Hello?! My own MD, > being knowledgeable and responsible, warned me off > sugar because my Mom has Type II. Other than all this, > yes, good one, welcome back, very LOL, etc. I wonder whether this from you to Robin could have been what raunchy was alluding to (September 6, 2012) rather than any of the above irrelevant gobbledygook: "Yes I will excuse your presumption if you excuse my not going down this particular rabbit hole again....So no problemo. Sigh, btw, I notice I'm feeling grumpy this morning. Blaming it on the sugar I ate yesterday. Somehow I've become very sensitive to sugar. Anyway, Robin, apologies for taking it out on you." Five days later, also to Robin, concerning the same incident: "As for what my feelings were, I didn't suffer or feel insulted. Nor did I think you were being hurtful or cruel. I simply did not want to pursue the theme of whether or not I was being the real me. Nor the theme of my alleged hyper positivity." Then *four weeks later*--again, with regard to the *very same incident*: "Just for the record, this is exactly why I got so upset initially with Robin about the Russian flash mob post. Being psychologically raped didn't feel good then just as it doesn't feel good now." A truly startling discrepancy--from "grumpy" at the time to "psychologically raped" four weeks later--that you have never been willing to acknowledge, much less explain. Very close parallel, it seems to me, with Steve's refusal to acknowledge his mistakes with regard to the charges he made against Ann--albeit the charges in his case were far less serious than in yours, of course. More on your earlier posts to me coming up shortly. > ________________________________ > From: raunchydog <raunchydog@...> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 11:10 PM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: parsing a la Descartes was HITLER'S VALENTINE > > --- In [email protected], "seventhray27" <steve.sundur@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" wrote: > > > > > So, the answer is no. You're just going to let all those > > > mistakes you made stand, never acknowledge them, let alone > > > apologize for them. That's what I figured, being familiar > > > with your ethics. > > > > > Judy, really, I am sorry. I can't relate to this. I > > don't know if it's because I'm just a little mentally > > fatigued , or maybe because I felt, (real or imagined, > > not sure), a slight shift in my awareness earlier this > > evening. I don't know, but I feel you're speaking a > > foreign language right now. > > Maybe you ate too much sugar.
