--- In [email protected], Share Long <sharelong60@...> wrote: > > Judy, as of yesterday, when your words sound sarcastic or > belligerent, hypocritical or prejudicial, then I stop reading > the post. For example, in your reply below, I stopped reading > after the second sentence.
Your loss, toots. Your question was disingenuous, you see, because the answer was right there in the post you were responding to; and in any case I've made clear a number of times now what I want from you. If you don't want a sarcastic response, don't ask me questions to which you already know the answers. You should be well aware by now that I'm allergic to dishonesty. > ________________________________ > From: authfriend <authfriend@...> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2013 3:19 PM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: parsing a la Descartes was HITLER'S VALENTINE > > > > Â > --- In [email protected], Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote: > > > > Judy, what do you want besides an apology from me to Robin about accusing > > him of psychological rape? > > Well, let's see whether I've ever said anything about > that. Let's look at the post from me you're responding > to first, shall we? Let's scroll down, see if we can > find anything along those lines: > > (snip) > > I wonder whether this from you to Robin could have been > > what raunchy was alluding to (September 6, 2012) rather > > than any of the above irrelevant gobbledygook: > > > > "Yes I will excuse your presumption if you excuse my not > > going down this particular rabbit hole again....So no > > problemo. Sigh, btw, I notice I'm feeling grumpy this morning. > > Blaming it on the sugar I ate yesterday. Somehow I've become > > very sensitive to sugar. Anyway, Robin, apologies for taking > > it out on you." > > > > Five days later, also to Robin, concerning the same incident: > > > > "As for what my feelings were, I didn't suffer or feel > > insulted. Nor did I think you were being hurtful or cruel. > > I simply did not want to pursue the theme of whether or not > > I was being the real me. Nor the theme of my alleged hyper > > positivity." > > > > Then *four weeks later*--again, with regard to the *very > > same incident*: > > > > "Just for the record, this is exactly why I got so upset > > initially with Robin about the Russian flash mob post. > > Being psychologically raped didn't feel good then just > > as it doesn't feel good now." > > > > A truly startling discrepancy--from "grumpy" at the > > time to "psychologically raped" four weeks later--that > > you have never been willing to acknowledge, much less > > explain. > > Ah, think this could be it, Share? >
