Oh I admit it is well made, and the actors (most of them were quite good) but 
the abuse and murder of women that seem to be a theme in his films was not to 
my taste - not to mention the irony of:

1 - Marshy and the TM leaders and the even low level governors who for YEARS 
have talked about how we need to be careful what we watch, what we think, what 
we say, what kind of energy we are putting out and "entertaining" - in other 
words not to "entertain" negativity by exposing oneself to it and by the way 
Big Bopper Bevan used to expound on such themes in staff meetings at MIU and 
here this ass Lynch who claims TM gave him the creativity to make the films is 
pumping out negativity at a phenomenal rate and don't bother to tell me that 
you don't think the films express negativity because by Movement standards his 
films are loaded with it.

2 - The irony of the Movement not allowing his films like Eraserhead, Blue 
Velvet and Twin Peaks to be shown at any of their facilities, yet praising the 
bastard for what a great filmmaker he is. Typical Movement hypocrisy.

For the record, I reviled Lynch when I first saw a few episodes of Twin Peaks, 
not knowing he was a meditator. When a TM friend in Kentucky told me that not 
only was Lynch an ardent TM'er, he had been meditating long before he made Twin 
Peaks, I thought he was out of his mind.




________________________________
 From: authfriend <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Saturday, June 1, 2013 1:46 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: For MJ and the Turq
 


  
--- In [email protected], Michael Jackson <mjackson74@...> wrote:
>
> If you can watch the Twin Peaks series and NOT say that son
> of a bitch is ill in his feeble mind then there is something 
> seriously wrong with you.

Must be something wrong with me, then. I thought much of
"Twin Peaks" was brilliant.

And it was must-see TV at the time, too, so I had lots of
company.

A lot of it was side-splittingly funny. Some of the humor
was creepy, but dude, this was prime-time network television,
so obviously it wasn't "ill" enough to make most people
uncomfortable.

If it made you uncomfortable, fine, you're entitled. But of
all the possible descriptions of the mind of the guy
responsible, "feeble" is about the last one that could
legitimately be applied.

IMHO, of course.


 

Reply via email to