Card, There's not enough information with the data you're providing. As such, we cannot make a fair evaluation of that chart.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "card" <cardemaister@...> wrote: > > > (Lahiri) Venus 25 Lib 36 conjunct Sun 26 Lib 03, > Mars 11 Sag 17. Any comments? (Almost certainly, not... heh heh...??) > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" <jr_esq@> wrote: > > > > Bhairitu, > > > > Your point is well taken. There are also many other areas in life that > > have to be taken into consideration. There's another case of an individual > > who has the conjunction of Venus and Mars. This conjunction is notorious > > for making an individual passionate and sexual. It would be harsh to tell > > the person NOT to get married. > > > > IMO, the best alternative advice is for the person to find a partner who > > has a similar relationship between the two planets. If that person is > > found, then the couple can get married. > > > > On the other hand, the person can choose to remain single, which would be > > more difficult but not impossible. Specifically, KN Rao, one of my jyotish > > teachers, has the same conjunction in his chart. His mother told him that > > as a mother she would prefer him to be a married. But as an astrologer, > > she would advise him not to get married. > > > > Also, Brendan Feeley, another one of my jyotish teachers, had the same > > conjunction. When he was in the Vaishnava monastery in India, his guru > > told him to disavow marriage. But, in spite of that advice, he left the > > ashram and got married to live here in the USA. To the best of my > > knowledge, he is still married as of date. > > > > JR > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <noozguru@> wrote: > > > > > > The first thing ANY jyotishi should look at in a horoscope is if the > > > person has karma for marriage at all. Some folks even have a sanyassi > > > yoga in their horoscope classically forbidding marriage. I recall > > > looking at someone's chart one time and saying they had no karma for > > > marriage. They laughed and said they'd been married three times. I > > > said, "yup, no karma for marriage." > > > > > > Nothing wrong with challenging that karma though but the test may just > > > prove it correct. Sometimes if a person meets someone they like then > > > like magic someone else pops up to take that person away from them. > > > > > > On 06/02/2013 10:22 AM, John wrote: > > > > > > > > Srijau, > > > > > > > > You have to understand the situation of marriage here in the USA and > > > > elsewhere in the world. The divorce rate in the USA is probably > > > > greater than 50 percent at this time. And this is largely due to a > > > > culture that primarily relies on sexual attraction and infatuation as > > > > the basis for marriage. (This is readily obvious in reading the lives > > > > of movie, television and entertainment stars today). > > > > > > > > So, with this background, it would be beneficial for couples to check > > > > their feelings with an objective measure based on a time-tested method > > > > that is available in jyotish. If a couple is advised of the > > > > compatibility analysis, they would be better informed as to the > > > > validity of their love for each other. As such, they should make a > > > > better decision for getting into a marriage contract. > > > > > > > > JR > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > > > <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com>, srijau@ <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I have read that compatibility analysis is only for arranged > > > > marriages and if two people are in love it is irrelevant. > > > > > Certainly there is much crappy (mis)use of Jyotish in the present > > > > time, I suggest you read PVR Narasimha Rao to get some insight into > > > > the present condition of Jyotish. Also Fairfield has a very good > > > > Jyotishi in David Hawthorne who practices a form of Jyotish that > > > > adapts to how the planets are really operating in the present time and > > > > does not take much of the orthodoxies for granted. I have heard that > > > > he was highly praised by Maharishi when he heard that he organized > > > > group program for people banned from the Dome! > > > > > There is someone posting in this group Jyotish "oriented" statements > > > > and I would describe these posts as nearly psychotic gibberish with a > > > > very poor understanding of Jyotish. Please do not judge Jyotish on the > > > > basis of such garbage. > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > > > <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com>, obbajeeba <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Let the bashing begin! > > > > > > What if a Pandit says and writes that someone is compatible with > > > > another, then a few years later the Pandit says the people are not > > > > compatible and he only said that because he thought that is what the > > > > couple wanted, and that he only went along with one's feelings because > > > > there was love and compassion in a charts and eventually one would > > > > find out they did not like each other? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
