I remember Marshy saying that the best jyotishee would be a 
computer because the universe worked in such a predictable
mechanical way, the less human interference in the process
the better!

I also remember the list of jyotish predictions that they
published every year. Had a full set in my office. Ever
quizzical I used to save them up and check to see how many
predictions came true. Not many.

I also remember the jyotish programme being suspended for
a while due to complaints about poor performance and then
re-introduced, but only for people who could provide the
birth details of both sets of grandparents! This would have
been in the late 90's.

Anyone puzzled about how this wonder may actually work should
check out Tony Nader's book of "discoveries" where there is a
diagram of the brain and how the planets join up to different
parts of it, presumably the parts that they govern. Planets
beyond Saturn aren't included, for some reason the vedic seers
chose not to cognize them. Or kept quite about it if they did.
You'd think an alleged scientist like Nader might try and fit
them in somehow, not enough ungoverned brain regions I guess.
Or maybe he'd have to have invent some more sanskrit names for
them. But to not even notice!

I wrote to him about this and a few other things, one of which
was how on Earth all this fitted in with evolution, but he never
wrote back. Presumably the invite to get in touch with comments
didn't extend to constructive criticism. The only comments they
published on the Marshy channel were of the "Wow, this knowledge
is the best thing ever!" variety.

That's the trouble with thinking you have Total Knowledge, there's
no room for improvement.



Reply via email to