--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" <jr_esq@...> wrote: > > Salyavin, > > You have to remember that jyotish is a model of a person's life potential > which takes into consideration the various probabilities and permutations of > his/her actions. IOW, a person has the free will to take whatever actions > are best for his/her life. As such, each action has a corresponding result > or fruit of action. > > In short, jyotish is the science of light which guides humans to take the > best actions (morally and holistically) in order to get the best results in > life.
But you've only got to do one thing opposite to what's recommended by the horoscope and the whole thing is irrelevant forever. Unless the universe resets itself to match your new destiny, which hardly seems likely. Think about it. If you aren't doing one day what was predicted then the next prediction is in error and they will keep being in error until you start going along with your earliest chart. Or is that the idea? Shit, maybe that's why it doesn't work..... > JR > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@> wrote: > > > > > > > > I remember Marshy saying that the best jyotishee would be a > > computer because the universe worked in such a predictable > > mechanical way, the less human interference in the process > > the better! > > > > I also remember the list of jyotish predictions that they > > published every year. Had a full set in my office. Ever > > quizzical I used to save them up and check to see how many > > predictions came true. Not many. > > > > I also remember the jyotish programme being suspended for > > a while due to complaints about poor performance and then > > re-introduced, but only for people who could provide the > > birth details of both sets of grandparents! This would have > > been in the late 90's. > > > > Anyone puzzled about how this wonder may actually work should > > check out Tony Nader's book of "discoveries" where there is a > > diagram of the brain and how the planets join up to different > > parts of it, presumably the parts that they govern. Planets > > beyond Saturn aren't included, for some reason the vedic seers > > chose not to cognize them. Or kept quite about it if they did. > > You'd think an alleged scientist like Nader might try and fit > > them in somehow, not enough ungoverned brain regions I guess. > > Or maybe he'd have to have invent some more sanskrit names for > > them. But to not even notice! > > > > I wrote to him about this and a few other things, one of which > > was how on Earth all this fitted in with evolution, but he never > > wrote back. Presumably the invite to get in touch with comments > > didn't extend to constructive criticism. The only comments they > > published on the Marshy channel were of the "Wow, this knowledge > > is the best thing ever!" variety. > > > > That's the trouble with thinking you have Total Knowledge, there's > > no room for improvement. > > >
