--- In [email protected], nablusoss1008 <no_reply@...> wrote: > --- In [email protected], nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" > > <anartaxius@> wrote: > > > --- In [email protected], nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > NASA Footage from NASA's Solar and Heliospheric Observatory > > > > (SOHO) in space shows a UFO that appears to fly through the sun's > > > > corona. Published on YouTube on 6 March 2013. (Source: YouTube: > > > > StephenHannardADGUK) > > > > > > > > (Benjamin Creme's Master confirms that the huge spacecraft was from > > > > the planet Mars.) > > > > > > > > > > > > [Share International photo for May 2013 x80;xa0;xa0;x92;xb6; Footage > > > > from NASAx80;xa0;xa0;x92;xb2;s Solar and Heliospheric Observatory > > > > (SOHO)] > > > > > > > > NASA Footage taken by SOHO can be seen in a video called "UFO > > > > Creates Massive Sun Flash", uploaded on 14 June 2012. The video > > > > comments include: "Three ring-shaped objects seem to phase into > > > > view. Object seems to power up before taking off. As the object files > > > > past the sun, a solar reaction is observed. This proves again that the > > > > UFO is real a clear and defined interaction between the object and > > > > the sun." (Source: YouTube: StephenHannardADGUK) > > > > > > > > (Benjamin Creme's Master explains that the object was a spacecraft > > > > from Mars. The speculation that "a solar reaction is observed" > > > > is not accurate. The spacecraft was actually registering and calculating > > > > a great release of energy from the sun, which is occurring now, and we > > > > on Earth are just beginning to feel it.) > > > > > > > > http://shareintl.org/magazine/old_issues/2013/2013-05.htm#signs > > > > <http://shareintl.org/magazine/old_issues/2013/2013-05.htm#signs> > > > > > > > Now we have it. Benjamin Creme's master must be an idiot. And like > > > master, like disciple, the disciple must not be far behind. > > > > > > 1) The 'object' is reflections in the SOHO optics caused by the bright > > > flare; the dark center in the reflection is the shadowing made by the > > > occulting disk that is used in such optics to block the brilliance of the > > > sun so the much dimmer corona can be photographed. > > > > > > Did you or NASA make this claim ? > > > > > > > > 2) Supposing this object is actually something near the Sun, it would be > > > at least the size of Jupiter or over twenty times the size of the planet > > > Mars, ergo, could not come from Mars, and could not have been built on > > > any planet in the Solar System, as a spacecraft that size, even built in > > > space here would require metallic and rocky materials of a mass equal to > > > all the planets in the Solar System combined, and those planets are still > > > round about. > > > > > > Since when did you become an expert on the construction of UFO's ? > > > > > > > > What is Benji smoking these days? > > > > I don't know if he still smokes but he used to smoke Cigarillos. > > > > May I suggest that you stick to law and surfing ? > > > Anyway Xeno, I was waiting for your explanation about your "reflection" > theory, but I gather you are dabbling in something useful, something you > actually know, like surfing for example. When you have the time, take a look > at the actual video; > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYGa8p-rwz8 > > And while you're at it, try explaining how optical "reflection" can move > within a frame taken with equipment that is standing still. > Good luck ! > NASA explains the marks in the LASCO coronagraph images in two ways.
1. Comic rays tear through the sensor and leave a streak. 2. There are occasionally dust particles that float by and as the optics are focused on infinity they are out of focus. I do not know the exposures times for these images, but the camera is not operating at frame rates like for movies or TV. The system can transmit images 10 per hour, so that seems to be what the instrument is capable of. The video on youtube besides being edited for effect, also show tinkering - the flashing of the 'spacecraft' - while the object flashes the noise in the supposed multiple frames does not change, so it is a doctored effect. The actual movement of the object between frames is probably authentic. It is probably out-of-focus dust. There are many optical elements in the LASCO coronagraph, and mulitple reflections of bright objects in the system can create this effect. The dark 'holes' in the object seem to be the effect of the occulting disk. Modern catadioptric telescope optics often have mirrors cemented in the center of one of the lenses - this makes for shorter lighter instruments, such as a catadioptirc telephoto camera lens for regular photography. With a coronagraph, the surface of the sun is blocked optically within the telescope tube but dust particles near the craft but out side the tube are fully illuminated by the sun so they appear very bright, and out of focus. Here is some information on the coronagraphs on SOHO - there are several of them: http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1995SoPh..162..357B (a schematic of the LASCO coronagraph is on page 375) So I do not think that video is convincing. I mean a real spacecraft would look really different. The USS Enterprise on the 1960s TV show Star Trek is move convincing than these images. You can see the original model in the Smithsonian in Washington, D.C. Why is it that UFOs are always fuzzy blobs that look like optical reflections or dust or physical defects in film or sensors? Nabby, particularly with modern photographic imaging, you would think a really clear image of something would be captured that wasn't so totally ambiguous.
