And has Judy never once badmouthed Curtis or Vaj or SalSunshine when they are not reading the traffic?
________________________________ From: authfriend <authfri...@yahoo.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 3:00 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Repealing TM's Anti-Saint Policies Of course, if we want to be ethical and not badmouth someone behind his back, it doesn't matter that we *think* he's reading the traffic. We don't do it unless we *know* he is, as I indicated to Share. But neither Share nor Steve is ethical enough or smart enough to understand this. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" <steve.sundur@...> wrote: > > Share, > If I were an odds maker, I'd put the odds at 90% that Robin reads every > post on this site. Probably in Starbucks right now reading this. > "Hey Robin, what it is? What's your take on the Hawks/Bruins final? > Como sa va. > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: > > > > Judy, you can plonk all you want, but can you prove that Robin is in > fact, as you originally said in your criticism of Susan, not around to > defend himself? Meaning not reading posts though obviously he is not > writing posts in response? > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: authfriend authfriend@ > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 10:50 AM > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Repealing TM's Anti-Saint Policies > > > > > > > > Â > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: > > > > > > Judy, given that others sometimes read posts but don't write posts > > > > *plonk* > > >
