--- In [email protected], Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@...> wrote: > > Barry - I fed your message into my very own patented, > perfected text compactor and here's what I got. > > "Judy, No - don't hurt me. You are nothing, you can't > hurt me. Ow, that hurt Judy, Judy don't hurt me."
FWIW, I wrote my post before reading yours. ;-) > Bruce Cockburn - you think he would have made a song out of this - "Judy, > don't hurt me"? > > On Jun 25, 2013, at 11:21 AM, turquoiseb <[email protected]> wrote: > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Ann" <awoelflebater@> wrote: > > > > > (snip) > > > > > > > Oh, the "theys" and the "theirs" of the world. Let's > > > > > > > just ridicule them to death. > > > > > > > > > > > > No, let's just ridicule them in the hope that someday > > > > > > they learn to laugh *along* with how ridiculous they > > > > > > are rather than get uptight when someone points it out. > > > > > > > > > > In the 18 years I've known you, Barry, I've never seen > > > > > you "laugh along with how ridiculous [you] are when someone > > > > > points it out" (lost control of your syntax there for a bit, > > > > > didn'tcha?). I have seen you *many, many* times get > > > > > uptight. You're uptight right now because Ann has pointed > > > > > out your ridiculousness. > > > > > > > > > > You don't walk your talk. You're a fraud and a phony. > > > > > > > > Judy dear, I am laughing *AT* both of you. > > > > > > You *thought* that's what you were doing. Then Ann > > > pointed out how ridiculous you were, and I pointed > > > out your hypocrisy, and you promptly melted down and > > > became even more ridiculous and hypocritical. > > > > > > That's just what you *do* when you yield to the > > > temptation to read what your critics say about you. > > > > > > You need to go back to reading only Message View and > > > pretending you don't hear the rest of us laughing at > > > you. Especially when you've been holding forth about > > > how people should be able to laugh at themselves. > > > > Judy, Judy, Judy. You forget that you are talking > > to people who've watched your trends for *far* too > > many years, and thus have noticed that all you are > > doing is projecting your fantasies onto the people > > you dislike. Same with Ann. You and she have some- > > thing in common besides having the worst taste in > > guys to become groupies for in human history. :-) > > > > If someone replies to something you've posted, in > > your heads you "win" and declare victory, and brag > > about how much you've affected them. If they *don't* > > reply, in your heads you "win" and brag about how > > effectively you've silenced them. In both cases, > > it's all going on in your heads. > > > > Neither your laughter nor your scorn affect me in > > any way. They're like the sounds of a dog farting, > > only less melodic. I have fun every so often taunting > > you, just to see which form of "Get Barry" you'll > > respond with *this* time, but that's pretty much it. > > > > And WHY should it be otherwise? You (Judy) have > > nothing to say worth listening to, much less having > > it affect me. All of your "knowledge" is THEORY, > > either gained from books or from what was told to you > > by people you choose to believe. You have almost > > ZERO actual experience along the spiritual path. > > > > And your world -- not to mention your persistent > > fantasies -- ALL seem to revolve around how much you > > have managed to HURT the people you hurl your invective > > and your scorn at. Pretty much the only person here > > who even bothers to interact with you about one of > > your pure-theory ego-arguments is Salyavin, and he > > does so fully aware of what is going to happen, and > > probably for the same reason I interact with you from > > time to time -- "Let's see which form her egomania > > and need to argue and need to feel superior takes > > this time." > > > > You have *NO* effect on anyone here, unless they allow > > you to. Most people have realized that it isn't worth > > their time and energy to allow you to. How you're going > > to turn anything said to you into an argument is a > > foregone conclusion, as is the lack of anything > > experiential you'll bring to the argument. > > > > If you and Ann would like to continue to fantasize about > > how much you're *affecting* people here, feel free to > > do so. You can even continue to pretend that you're > > "getting to" or "getting" the people you have vendettas > > against. But it t'ain't so. > > > > We really ARE laughing at you. When we're not rolling > > our eyes and feeling sorry for you, that is. > > > > As for who is "affecting" whom, we'll see, won't we? > > > > How many more vindictive, angry posts will you get out > > of this thread? How long can you drag it out and make > > it last? :-) > > > > The longer you do, the more you'll believe you're > > "winning." But the longer it goes on, the more of a > > loser you'll prove yourself to be, and the more you'll > > demonstrate exactly WHO in this equation got their > > buttons pushed. > > > > NOTHING you can say can change that. And that's what > > pushes your buttons, and makes you behave like this > > even more. > > > > You're a nonentity. *Nothing* you say matters. > > > > > > No one > > > > sane could take *EITHER* of you seriously, or be > > > > bothered by anything you say. Get real. > > > > > > > > If you'd like to laugh *ALONG*, that is your right... :-) > > > > > > > > > > > >
