Well I for one really like Bruce Cockburn's music and never would even have 
known about it had not turq posted some of it so I'm grateful to him for that.




________________________________
 From: Ravi Chivukula <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 2:51 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: A culture of PR and Spin, ending 
with...uh...more PR and Spin
 


  
Barry - I fed your message into my very own patented, perfected text compactor 
and here's what I got.

"Judy, No - don't hurt me. You are nothing, you can't hurt me. Ow, that hurt 
Judy, Judy don't hurt me."


Bruce Cockburn - you think he would have made a song out of this - "Judy, don't 
hurt me"?

On Jun 25, 2013, at 11:21 AM, turquoiseb <[email protected]> wrote:


  
>--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <authfriend@...> wrote:
>>
>> --- In [email protected], turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote:
>> >
>> > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > --- In [email protected], turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > --- In [email protected], "Ann" <awoelflebater@> wrote:
>> > > (snip)
>> > > > > Oh, the "theys" and the "theirs" of the world. Let's 
>> > > > > just ridicule them to death.
>> > > > 
>> > > > No, let's just ridicule them in the hope that someday
>> > > > they learn to laugh *along* with how ridiculous they
>> > > > are rather than get uptight when someone points it out.
>> > > 
>> > > In the 18 years I've known you, Barry, I've never seen
>> > > you "laugh along with how ridiculous [you] are when someone
>> > > points it out" (lost control of your syntax there for a bit,
>> > > didn'tcha?). I have seen you *many, many* times get
>> > > uptight. You're uptight right now because Ann has pointed
>> > > out your ridiculousness.
>> > > 
>> > > You don't walk your talk. You're a fraud and a phony.
>> > 
>> > Judy dear, I am laughing *AT* both of you.
>> 
>> You *thought* that's what you were doing. Then Ann
>> pointed out how ridiculous you were, and I pointed
>> out your hypocrisy, and you promptly melted down and
>> became even more ridiculous and hypocritical.
>> 
>> That's just what you *do* when you yield to the
>> temptation to read what your critics say about you.
>> 
>> You need to go back to reading only Message View and
>> pretending you don't hear the rest of us laughing at
>> you. Especially when you've been holding forth about
>> how people should be able to laugh at themselves.
>
>Judy, Judy, Judy. You forget that you are talking
>to people who've watched your trends for *far* too
>many years, and thus have noticed that all you are
>doing is projecting your fantasies onto the people
>you dislike. Same with Ann. You and she have some-
>thing in common besides having the worst taste in 
>guys to become groupies for in human history. :-)
>
>If someone replies to something you've posted, in
>your heads you "win" and declare victory, and brag
>about how much you've affected them. If they *don't*
>reply, in your heads you "win" and brag about how 
>effectively you've silenced them. In both cases,
>it's all going on in your heads. 
>
>Neither your laughter nor your scorn affect me in
>any way. They're like the sounds of a dog farting,
>only less melodic. I have fun every so often taunting 
>you, just to see which form of "Get Barry" you'll 
>respond with *this* time, but that's pretty much it. 
>
>And WHY should it be otherwise? You (Judy) have 
>nothing to say worth listening to, much less having 
>it affect me. All of your "knowledge" is THEORY, 
>either gained from books or from what was told to you 
>by people you choose to believe. You have almost 
>ZERO actual experience along the spiritual path. 
>
>And your world -- not to mention your persistent
>fantasies -- ALL seem to revolve around how much you
>have managed to HURT the people you hurl your invective
>and your scorn at. Pretty much the only person here
>who even bothers to interact with you about one of
>your pure-theory ego-arguments is Salyavin, and he
>does so fully aware of what is going to happen, and
>probably for the same reason I interact with you from
>time to time -- "Let's see which form her egomania
>and need to argue and need to feel superior takes
>this time." 
>
>You have *NO* effect on anyone here, unless they allow
>you to. Most people have realized that it isn't worth
>their time and energy to allow you to. How you're going
>to turn anything said to you into an argument is a 
>foregone conclusion, as is the lack of anything 
>experiential you'll bring to the argument. 
>
>If you and Ann would like to continue to fantasize about
>how much you're *affecting* people here, feel free to
>do so. You can even continue to pretend that you're
>"getting to" or "getting" the people you have vendettas
>against. But it t'ain't so. 
>
>We really ARE laughing at you. When we're not rolling
>our eyes and feeling sorry for you, that is. 
>
>As for who is "affecting" whom, we'll see, won't we?
>
>How many more vindictive, angry posts will you get out
>of this thread? How long can you drag it out and make 
>it last?  :-)
>
>The longer you do, the more you'll believe you're 
>"winning." But the longer it goes on, the more of a 
>loser you'll prove yourself to be, and the more you'll
>demonstrate exactly WHO in this equation got their 
>buttons pushed. 
>
>NOTHING you can say can change that. And that's what
>pushes your buttons, and makes you behave like this
>even more.
>
>You're a nonentity. *Nothing* you say matters.
>
>> > No one
>> > sane could take *EITHER* of you seriously, or be
>> > bothered by anything you say. Get real. 
>> > 
>> > If you'd like to laugh *ALONG*, that is your right... :-)
>> >
>>
>
>
 

Reply via email to