--- In [email protected], Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@...> wrote:
>
> Barry - I fed your message into my very own patented, perfected text 
> compactor and here's what I got.
> 
> "Judy, No - don't hurt me. You are nothing, you can't hurt me. Ow, that hurt 
> Judy, Judy don't hurt me."
> 
> Bruce Cockburn - you think he would have made a song out of this - "Judy, 
> don't hurt me"?

Have I ever told you how brilliant you were, Ravi?
> 
> On Jun 25, 2013, at 11:21 AM, turquoiseb <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In [email protected], turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Ann" <awoelflebater@> wrote:
> > > > > (snip)
> > > > > > > Oh, the "theys" and the "theirs" of the world. Let's 
> > > > > > > just ridicule them to death.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > No, let's just ridicule them in the hope that someday
> > > > > > they learn to laugh *along* with how ridiculous they
> > > > > > are rather than get uptight when someone points it out.
> > > > > 
> > > > > In the 18 years I've known you, Barry, I've never seen
> > > > > you "laugh along with how ridiculous [you] are when someone
> > > > > points it out" (lost control of your syntax there for a bit,
> > > > > didn'tcha?). I have seen you *many, many* times get
> > > > > uptight. You're uptight right now because Ann has pointed
> > > > > out your ridiculousness.
> > > > > 
> > > > > You don't walk your talk. You're a fraud and a phony.
> > > > 
> > > > Judy dear, I am laughing *AT* both of you.
> > > 
> > > You *thought* that's what you were doing. Then Ann
> > > pointed out how ridiculous you were, and I pointed
> > > out your hypocrisy, and you promptly melted down and
> > > became even more ridiculous and hypocritical.
> > > 
> > > That's just what you *do* when you yield to the
> > > temptation to read what your critics say about you.
> > > 
> > > You need to go back to reading only Message View and
> > > pretending you don't hear the rest of us laughing at
> > > you. Especially when you've been holding forth about
> > > how people should be able to laugh at themselves.
> > 
> > Judy, Judy, Judy. You forget that you are talking
> > to people who've watched your trends for *far* too
> > many years, and thus have noticed that all you are
> > doing is projecting your fantasies onto the people
> > you dislike. Same with Ann. You and she have some-
> > thing in common besides having the worst taste in 
> > guys to become groupies for in human history. :-)
> > 
> > If someone replies to something you've posted, in
> > your heads you "win" and declare victory, and brag
> > about how much you've affected them. If they *don't*
> > reply, in your heads you "win" and brag about how 
> > effectively you've silenced them. In both cases,
> > it's all going on in your heads. 
> > 
> > Neither your laughter nor your scorn affect me in
> > any way. They're like the sounds of a dog farting,
> > only less melodic. I have fun every so often taunting 
> > you, just to see which form of "Get Barry" you'll 
> > respond with *this* time, but that's pretty much it. 
> > 
> > And WHY should it be otherwise? You (Judy) have 
> > nothing to say worth listening to, much less having 
> > it affect me. All of your "knowledge" is THEORY, 
> > either gained from books or from what was told to you 
> > by people you choose to believe. You have almost 
> > ZERO actual experience along the spiritual path. 
> > 
> > And your world -- not to mention your persistent
> > fantasies -- ALL seem to revolve around how much you
> > have managed to HURT the people you hurl your invective
> > and your scorn at. Pretty much the only person here
> > who even bothers to interact with you about one of
> > your pure-theory ego-arguments is Salyavin, and he
> > does so fully aware of what is going to happen, and
> > probably for the same reason I interact with you from
> > time to time -- "Let's see which form her egomania
> > and need to argue and need to feel superior takes
> > this time." 
> > 
> > You have *NO* effect on anyone here, unless they allow
> > you to. Most people have realized that it isn't worth
> > their time and energy to allow you to. How you're going
> > to turn anything said to you into an argument is a 
> > foregone conclusion, as is the lack of anything 
> > experiential you'll bring to the argument. 
> > 
> > If you and Ann would like to continue to fantasize about
> > how much you're *affecting* people here, feel free to
> > do so. You can even continue to pretend that you're
> > "getting to" or "getting" the people you have vendettas
> > against. But it t'ain't so. 
> > 
> > We really ARE laughing at you. When we're not rolling
> > our eyes and feeling sorry for you, that is. 
> > 
> > As for who is "affecting" whom, we'll see, won't we?
> > 
> > How many more vindictive, angry posts will you get out
> > of this thread? How long can you drag it out and make 
> > it last? :-)
> > 
> > The longer you do, the more you'll believe you're 
> > "winning." But the longer it goes on, the more of a 
> > loser you'll prove yourself to be, and the more you'll
> > demonstrate exactly WHO in this equation got their 
> > buttons pushed. 
> > 
> > NOTHING you can say can change that. And that's what
> > pushes your buttons, and makes you behave like this
> > even more.
> > 
> > You're a nonentity. *Nothing* you say matters.
> > 
> > > > No one
> > > > sane could take *EITHER* of you seriously, or be
> > > > bothered by anything you say. Get real. 
> > > > 
> > > > If you'd like to laugh *ALONG*, that is your right... :-)
> > > >
> > >
> > 
> >
>


Reply via email to