--- In [email protected], turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Ann" <awoelflebater@> wrote: > > > > (snip) > > > > > > Oh, the "theys" and the "theirs" of the world. Let's > > > > > > just ridicule them to death. > > > > > > > > > > No, let's just ridicule them in the hope that someday > > > > > they learn to laugh *along* with how ridiculous they > > > > > are rather than get uptight when someone points it out. > > > > > > > > In the 18 years I've known you, Barry, I've never seen > > > > you "laugh along with how ridiculous [you] are when someone > > > > points it out" (lost control of your syntax there for a bit, > > > > didn'tcha?). I have seen you *many, many* times get > > > > uptight. You're uptight right now because Ann has pointed > > > > out your ridiculousness. > > > > > > > > You don't walk your talk. You're a fraud and a phony. > > > > > > Judy dear, I am laughing *AT* both of you. > > > > You *thought* that's what you were doing. Then Ann > > pointed out how ridiculous you were, and I pointed > > out your hypocrisy, and you promptly melted down and > > became even more ridiculous and hypocritical. > > > > That's just what you *do* when you yield to the > > temptation to read what your critics say about you. > > > > You need to go back to reading only Message View and > > pretending you don't hear the rest of us laughing at > > you. Especially when you've been holding forth about > > how people should be able to laugh at themselves. > > Judy, Judy, Judy. You forget that you are talking > to people who've watched your trends for *far* too > many years, and thus have noticed that all you are > doing is projecting your fantasies onto the people > you dislike.
So funny; you are talking about yourself and you just don't see it. The paragraph should have started "Barry, Barry, Barry..." >Same with Ann. You and she have some- > thing in common besides having the worst taste in > guys to become groupies for in human history. :-) Speaking of groupies: You still remark and marvel at Rama's parlour tricks and his extraordinary narcissism and his insatiable appetite for power and adoration. You take great pride in having known the man. You have been and continue to be awestruck by his all powerful group meditations and his sleight of hand. Your pride showed today in your "woo post". It came through loud and clear. You see your exposure to Lenz's woo as some special badge of honour. Ah, the old glory days, eh Barry? > > If someone replies to something you've posted, in > your heads you "win" and declare victory, and brag > about how much you've affected them. Show me bragging, Barry. I've never seen it and I'd like to. >If they *don't* > reply, in your heads you "win" and brag about how > effectively you've silenced them. In both cases, > it's all going on in your heads. Show me, show me where I have bragged. Please, Barry, I'm begging you. You surely love it when I beg, don't you? > > Neither your laughter nor your scorn affect me in > any way. They're like the sounds of a dog farting, > only less melodic. I have fun every so often taunting > you, just to see which form of "Get Barry" you'll > respond with *this* time, but that's pretty much it. You were not having any fun today just like you aren't having fun now. You hate it when you are so easily shown the door. In fact, you hated it so much you are actually responding to my posts and to Judy's. Except, it isn't making things better. Sorry about that. I just can't help myself. I warned you, I can be a real jerk. > > And WHY should it be otherwise? You (Judy) have > nothing to say worth listening to, much less having > it affect me. God Lord, no. > All of your "knowledge" is THEORY, > either gained from books or from what was told to you > by people you choose to believe. You have almost > ZERO actual experience along the spiritual path. I've lost track, are you talking to me or Judy now? > > And your world -- not to mention your persistent > fantasies -- ALL seem to revolve around how much you > have managed to HURT the people you hurl your invective > and your scorn at. Pretty much the only person here > who even bothers to interact with you about one of > your pure-theory ego-arguments is Salyavin, and he > does so fully aware of what is going to happen, and > probably for the same reason I interact with you from > time to time -- "Let's see which form her egomania > and need to argue and need to feel superior takes > this time." Oh, you're talking to Ms Stein. Got it. > > You have *NO* effect on anyone here, unless they allow > you to. Most people have realized that it isn't worth > their time and energy to allow you to. How you're going > to turn anything said to you into an argument is a > foregone conclusion, as is the lack of anything > experiential you'll bring to the argument.' Barry is fading in and out of who and what he is talking to and about. You there Wright? Keep that Judy in your sights, okay? She's a slippery one, or maybe it's just your mind that's slipping. > > If you and Ann would like to continue to fantasize about > how much you're *affecting* people here, feel free to > do so. You can even continue to pretend that you're > "getting to" or "getting" the people you have vendettas > against. But it t'ain't so. No it ain't. Okay Barry, whatever you say. Judy and I are out to GET YOU so look out. It may not be today, it may not be tomorrow but we're comin' for you. Lock that door, close those curtains the evil twins might already be enroute. Judy is packing her duffel in New Jersey and I'm packing the overnighter in Victoria and we've got plans, we've got our Eurostar tickets in hand and will see you in some dark tunnel (chunnel) somewhere between Dover and Calais. Our ultimate vendetta: corner Barry in the bar car and make him buy us the most expensive Champagne on the menu. > > We really ARE laughing at you. When we're not rolling > our eyes and feeling sorry for you, that is. Who are "we"? > > As for who is "affecting" whom, we'll see, won't we? Maybe, maybe not. Do you want to see or would you rather just keep guessing? > > How many more vindictive, angry posts will you get out > of this thread? How long can you drag it out and make > it last? :-) Who's angry? I'm just playing with you dear heart. (You don't mind if I call you that do you?) Judy probably has her own pet name for you. > > The longer you do, the more you'll believe you're > "winning." But the longer it goes on, the more of a > loser you'll prove yourself to be, and the more you'll > demonstrate exactly WHO in this equation got their > buttons pushed. I don't have buttons anymore. I have switches. > > NOTHING you can say can change that. And that's what > pushes your buttons, and makes you behave like this > even more. Behave like what? > > You're a nonentity. *Nothing* you say matters. I can see that. > > > > > No one > > > sane could take *EITHER* of you seriously, or be > > > bothered by anything you say. Get real. > > > > > > If you'd like to laugh *ALONG*, that is your right... :-) > > > > > >
