--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@...> wrote:
>
> On 6/26/2013 11:16 PM, turquoiseb wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com>, Ravi Chivukula
> > <chivukula.ravi@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Could you be any more irrational and idiotic Barry baby?
> > >
> > > Here's Ann - someone who was there, not your paranoid,
> > > delusional fantasies
> > >
> > > "I find it quite ridiculous that Barry has once again
> > > brought up this hitting thing. Not only are people well
> > > over this subject but it amounts to, in the end, a
> > > paltry hill of beans. It never was about the hitting..."
> >
> > I will respond to this because here Ann (and Ravi,
> > agreeing with her) reveal *exactly* why people regard
> > both of them as Class-A Cultists.
> >
>
> Ha ha good one - Ravi, a Class-A Cultist. This should be a clue to
> anyone who wants to take your paranoid rant seriously.
if I may join you here, I would have to say, once I stop guffawing, that I am
(probably) one of the last people you could call a "cultist" on the planet
(other than you, perhaps). Now I'll just wipe up that bugger that came flying
out of my nose as I snorted with laughter a moment ago upon reading Barry's
'accusation'.
>
>
> >
> > It really *was* "about the hitting." Vaj said that
> > Robin had repeatedly struck his students. Robin not
> > only denied this explicitly ("I would never do that"),
> > he repeatedly called Vaj a liar for having suggested
> > it. And some people on this forum -- cultists all --
> > rallied behind Robin in this, and treated whistle-
> > blower Vaj the same way the US government is trying
> > to treat people who revealed things about *it* that
> > they would rather not have been revealed.
> >
> > Then what happens? Backed into a corner, Robin ADMITS
> > to having struck his students, and repeatedly, just
> > as Vaj said he had. And what do the same cultists
> > here do *then*? They make excuses for his behavior,
> > and find ways to "shoot the messenger" and pretend
> > that the issue was "never about the hitting."
> >
> > You'll have to forgive me if I see this behavior as
> > strongly analogous to children who have been abused
> > by their parents making excuses for those abusive
> > parents. "He had his reasons for hitting me/breaking
> > my arm/whatever."
> >
> > This is revealing of the inability to differentiate
> > between what one THINKS and what one DOES I wrote
> > about earlier. In the cultist's mind, there are
> > possible justifications for a teacher striking his
> > students. The justifications always seem to be based
> > on what the abuser was THINKING at the time, not
> > what he was actually DOING.
> >
> > It was ALWAYS "about the hitting." It's only the
> > die-hard cultists trying to protect their past or
> > present investment in fantasies about Robin who are
> > trying to make it appear to be something else.
> >
> > Robin physically struck his students, and can find
> > ways to justify that. His "defenders" KNOW that he
> > repeatedly physically struck his students, and con-
> > tinue to find ways to justify that. THAT is why this
> > topic continues to come up. THAT is the very stuff
> > of the cult mindset.
> >
> >
>
