--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > Can you repeat the question in more detail. > > > > I have the answer. > > > > > > What is it that's "uncertain" in Heisenberg's Uncertainty > > > Principle? > > > > > > Before you do the experiment, the position, direction, and spin of > > the particle cannot be known because it is only when the observer > > observes the atom that it has the characteristics you observe. > > In other words, it really was not a particle until it is > concretized > > by an observation, and the observer had a part in it's > > state/creation. It was really just a potential in the field, and it > > had infinite possible trajecteries and spin, but it cannot be known > > ahead of time which it would take. It is uncertain. > > Only after observation can one see which trajectory it took. It > > could take any. > > Even after it is observed, one cannot really say it is a concrete > > item. It is really a wave with no real boundaries within the quantum > > ocean that it arises from. Therefore, the characteristics of the > > universe are dependent on the characteristics of the observer, (as > > Maharishi has stated). > > Well done. Just as a question, what does this principle > have to say about multiple observers? What does the > potential do when suddenly observed simultaneously by > two different observers? Are there two waves, one for > each observer, or is there only one, some kind of com- > posite wave, generated by the combined influence of > the two observers?
Good question. There is no such thing as simultaneous observation though. It is similar to that space problem posed that if you always travel just half the remaining distance to an object, you will never reach the object. Same thing: No matter how closely two observers attempt to observe an object at the same time, they will never observe it at exactly the same time, and hence will always see the characteristics of the object differently. If you watch your own reality carefully, you will see through direct observation that what appears to be a seamless series of events witnessed by you, forming a unified vision of the world, is, in fact, a series of rapidly changing snapshots of the world, interspersed by an equal number of direct observations of infinity, of infinite potential. I am not speaking of theory here, but of direct observation. So there is too much infinity, or infinite interference if you will, for two observers to observe something at exactly the same time. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
