--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > Can you repeat the question in more detail. > > > > > I have the answer. > > > > > > > > What is it that's "uncertain" in Heisenberg's Uncertainty > > > > Principle? > > > > > > > > > Before you do the experiment, the position, direction, and spin > of > > > the particle cannot be known because it is only when the > observer > > > observes the atom that it has the characteristics you observe. > > > In other words, it really was not a particle until it is > > concretized > > > by an observation, and the observer had a part in it's > > > state/creation. It was really just a potential in the field, and > it > > > had infinite possible trajecteries and spin, but it cannot be > known > > > ahead of time which it would take. It is uncertain. > > > Only after observation can one see which trajectory it took. It > > > could take any. > > > Even after it is observed, one cannot really say it is a > concrete > > > item. It is really a wave with no real boundaries within the > quantum > > > ocean that it arises from. Therefore, the characteristics of the > > > universe are dependent on the characteristics of the observer, > (as > > > Maharishi has stated). > > > > Well done. Just as a question, what does this principle > > have to say about multiple observers? What does the > > potential do when suddenly observed simultaneously by > > two different observers? Are there two waves, one for > > each observer, or is there only one, some kind of com- > > posite wave, generated by the combined influence of > > the two observers? > > Good question. There is no such thing as simultaneous observation > though. It is similar to that space problem posed that if you always > travel just half the remaining distance to an object, you will never > reach the object. > > Same thing: No matter how closely two observers attempt to observe > an object at the same time, they will never observe it at exactly > the same time, and hence will always see the characteristics of the > object differently. > > If you watch your own reality carefully, you will see through direct > observation that what appears to be a seamless series of events > witnessed by you, forming a unified vision of the world, is, in > fact, a series of rapidly changing snapshots of the world, > interspersed by an equal number of direct observations of infinity, > of infinite potential. > > I am not speaking of theory here, but of direct observation. So > there is too much infinity, or infinite interference if you will, > for two observers to observe something at exactly the same time.>>>
Yep, Jim hit the nail on the head here. Good explanation. OffWorld ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
